Canara Bank, Usilampatti Branch through its Chief Manager vs Chinnasamy — 23/2025
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section Section22ofTNCFandSVAct. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD240000492025
e-Filing Number
02-02-2025
Filing Number
49/2025
Filing Date
04-Feb-2025
Registration No
23/2025
Registration Date
13-Feb-2025
Court
Sub Court, Usilampatti
Judge
3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Canara Bank, Usilampatti Branch through its Chief Manager
Adv. S GANAPATHY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chinnasamy
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary: Case 23/2025 - Canara Bank v. Chinnasamy The court ordered the respondent (Chinnasamy) to pay the petitioner bank ₹2,92,050 as the outstanding loan amount, plus 13.5% annual interest from the loan disbursement date (20.02.2012) until full payment. The respondent had defaulted on a ₹90,000 loan taken in 2012 with 60-month repayment terms, and the court found his claim to relief was valid based on documented loan agreements and multiple reminder notices issued by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
10-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
16-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
04-Nov-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
16-Sep-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
15-Jul-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
21-Apr-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Sub Judge, Usilampatti
-
17-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 23/2025
Summary: Case 23/2025 - Canara Bank v. Chinnasamy The court ordered the respondent (Chinnasamy) to pay the petitioner bank ₹2,92,050 as the outstanding loan amount, plus 13.5% annual interest from the loan disbursement date (20.02.2012) until full payment. The respondent had defaulted on a ₹90,000 loan taken in 2012 with 60-month repayment terms, and the court found his claim to relief was valid based on documented loan agreements and multiple reminder notices issued by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts