Vellaisamy vs Vimaleeswarapandiyan and 2 others — 1/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41 R 1 cpc. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA - Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

CNR: TNMD240000262026

Filing Number

26/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

Sub Court, Usilampatti

Judge

3-Sub Judge, Usilampatti

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 41 R 1 cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vellaisamy

    Adv. SOODAMANI K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vimaleeswarapandiyan and 2 others

  2. 2.Chinnasamy(death)

  3. 3.Muthaiya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case 1/2026 Summary The Usilampatti court dismissed Vellaisamy's civil appeal challenging an interim order dated 18.11.2025 in an underlying suit concerning water rights from a public canal. The court held that the trial court properly dismissed the interim relief, reasoning that the petitioner had failed to produce documentary evidence establishing his right to draw water from the canal, whereas the respondents' survey documents clearly indicated their ownership rights to the relevant properties. The court found no grounds to interfere with the trial court's order and declined to grant interim relief, directing that final determination of water rights must occur only after complete trial of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Usilampatti

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 1/2026 Summary The Usilampatti court dismissed Vellaisamy's civil appeal challenging an interim order dated 18.11.2025 in an underlying suit concerning water rights from a public canal. The court held that the trial court properly dismissed the interim relief, reasoning that the petitioner had failed to produce documentary evidence establishing his right to draw water from the canal, whereas the respondents' survey documents clearly indicated their ownership rights to the relevant properties. The court found no grounds to interfere with the trial court's order and declined to grant interim relief, directing that final determination of water rights must occur only after complete trial of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case