Melur P.s vs Thiruvasakam and 4 others — 446/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 147, 148. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNMD230009892021

Issue of Service

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

446/2021

Filing Date

23-12-2021

Registration No

446/2021

Registration Date

23-12-2021

Court

Sub Court, Melur

Judge

2-Sub Judge, Melur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 Section 147, 148
MP/1/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Thiruvasakam and 4 othersMelur P.s
MP/2/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.PC Section Thiruvasakam and 4 othersMelur P.s

Petitioner(s)

Melur P.s

Respondent(s)

Thiruvasakam and 4 others

Nambi (Chandran)

Manickavasakam

Rajadhilagam

Ramanbabu

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur

16-04-2026

Issue of Service

01-04-2026

Issue of Service

13-03-2026

Issue of Service

09-03-2026

Issue of Service

24-02-2026

Issue of Service

Interim Orders

08-10-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This is a Tamil language criminal case order (S.C No. 446/2021) from the Assistant Sessions Court in Melur. The case involves charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, and 307 related to a violent altercation. After examining witness statements, documentary evidence (including a vehicle, weapons, and medical records), and hearing arguments from both the accused and prosecution, the court rejected the accused's bail petition and found sufficient grounds to proceed with the trial. The matter is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Tamil language criminal case order (S.C No. 446/2021) from the Assistant Sessions Court in Melur. The case involves charges under IPC sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, and 307 related to a violent altercation. After examining witness statements, documentary evidence (including a vehicle, weapons, and medical records), and hearing arguments from both the accused and prosecution, the court rejected the accused's bail petition and found sufficient grounds to proceed with the trial. The matter is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Melur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case