S.Savithri and one another vs T.Abilash and one another Advocate - A.Parthiban — 26/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 140. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNMD230008912022

Steps

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1021/2022

Filing Date

23-12-2022

Registration No

26/2022

Registration Date

23-12-2022

Court

Sub Court, Melur

Judge

2-Sub Judge, Melur

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 140
IA/5/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section S.Savithri and one anotherThe United India Insurance company Ltd, through its Branch Manager
IA/6/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section S.Savithri and one anotherT.Abilash and one another

Petitioner(s)

S.Savithri and one another

Adv. M.Muthaiah

V.Moogambigai

Respondent(s)

T.Abilash and one another Advocate - A.Parthiban

The United India Insurance company Ltd, through its Branch Manager

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur

01-04-2026

Steps

13-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Evidence

26-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

03-11-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Summary In this motor vehicle accident case (MCOP No. 29/2024) decided by the Sub Judge, Melur on 03.11.2025, the court dismissed the plaintiff's petition for compensation. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide adequate documentary evidence of medical treatment costs and that the accident occurred due to the plaintiff's own negligence in not wearing proper safety gear while riding a scooter, thereby rejecting the claim for damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this motor vehicle accident case (MCOP No. 29/2024) decided by the Sub Judge, Melur on 03.11.2025, the court dismissed the plaintiff's petition for compensation. The court found that the plaintiff failed to provide adequate documentary evidence of medical treatment costs and that the accident occurred due to the plaintiff's own negligence in not wearing proper safety gear while riding a scooter, thereby rejecting the claim for damages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Melur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case