Sangeetha and 2 others vs Alagarsamy and 4others — 322/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section or7 r1. Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD230006842024

Issue of Service

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

802/2024

Filing Date

21-09-2024

Registration No

322/2024

Registration Date

05-11-2024

Court

Sub Court, Melur

Judge

2-Sub Judge, Melur

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section or7 r1

Petitioner(s)

Sangeetha and 2 others

Adv. Raj Prabhakaran

Minor.Swetha

Minor.Rishvath

Respondent(s)

Alagarsamy and 4others

Shanthi

Kannan

Brintha

Indhumathi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur

20-04-2026

Issue of Service

16-03-2026

Issue of Service

19-02-2026

Issue of Service

07-01-2026

Issue of Service

27-11-2025

Issue of Service

Interim Orders

01-08-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

CASE SUMMARY: O.S. No. 322/2024, Melur Sub Court The petition filed by Sangeetha and her two minor children against Alagarsamy, Santhi, Kannan, Brendha, and Indhumathi seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendants from selling family ancestral property was allowed on 01.08.2025. The petitioner alleged the 3rd respondent (her husband) abandoned the family in 2020 without maintenance, sold her jewelry, and that defendants now threaten to sell ancestral property in Keezhakalandari. With respondents 1, 2, 4, and 5 absent and unrepresented (no counter-filed), the court granted the injunction preventing sale until property shares are divided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: O.S. No. 322/2024, Melur Sub Court The petition filed by Sangeetha and her two minor children against Alagarsamy, Santhi, Kannan, Brendha, and Indhumathi seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendants from selling family ancestral property was allowed on 01.08.2025. The petitioner alleged the 3rd respondent (her husband) abandoned the family in 2020 without maintenance, sold her jewelry, and that defendants now threaten to sell ancestral property in Keezhakalandari. With respondents 1, 2, 4, and 5 absent and unrepresented (no counter-filed), the court granted the injunction preventing sale until property shares are divided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Melur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case