B.Gowsalya Rani and 3 others vs M.Gopalsingh @ Ramgopal singh and 1 another — 252/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7 Ru.1, 2 sec.26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD230005412022

Evidence

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

633/2022

Filing Date

29-08-2022

Registration No

252/2022

Registration Date

29-08-2022

Court

Sub Court, Melur

Judge

2-Sub Judge, Melur

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section Or.7 Ru.1, 2 sec.26
IA/3/2024 Classification : 151 Petition Section B.Gowsalya Rani and 3 othersB.Jai Karthick singh

Petitioner(s)

B.Gowsalya Rani and 3 others

Adv. V.Nagendran

B.Jai Karthick singh

B.Ram Kishan singh

B.Lakman singh

Respondent(s)

M.Gopalsingh @ Ramgopal singh and 1 another

M.Santhar Mansingh

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur

15-04-2026

Evidence

25-03-2026

Evidence

09-03-2026

Trial

11-02-2026

Trial

12-01-2026

Await Reports

Interim Orders

11-04-2023
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: The suit filed by four plaintiffs for declaration of title to a rice mill property and permanent injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs, as legal heirs of Bhagavansingh (who received the property via a 2012 gift deed), had acquired prescriptive title through continuous possession exceeding the statutory period and had maintained all tax payments. The court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the property, noting the defendants' attempted encroachment with a bulldozer in July 2022 caused damages worth Rs. 25,000. The defendants appeared through counsel but filed no written statement and did not contest the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The suit filed by four plaintiffs for declaration of title to a rice mill property and permanent injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs, as legal heirs of Bhagavansingh (who received the property via a 2012 gift deed), had acquired prescriptive title through continuous possession exceeding the statutory period and had maintained all tax payments. The court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the property, noting the defendants' attempted encroachment with a bulldozer in July 2022 caused damages worth Rs. 25,000. The defendants appeared through counsel but filed no written statement and did not contest the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Melur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case