B.Gowsalya Rani and 3 others vs M.Gopalsingh @ Ramgopal singh and 1 another — 252/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or.7 Ru.1, 2 sec.26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD230005412022
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
633/2022
Filing Date
29-08-2022
Registration No
252/2022
Registration Date
29-08-2022
Court
Sub Court, Melur
Judge
2-Sub Judge, Melur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
B.Gowsalya Rani and 3 others
Adv. V.Nagendran
B.Jai Karthick singh
B.Ram Kishan singh
B.Lakman singh
Respondent(s)
M.Gopalsingh @ Ramgopal singh and 1 another
M.Santhar Mansingh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 11-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 12-01-2026 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The suit filed by four plaintiffs for declaration of title to a rice mill property and permanent injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs, as legal heirs of Bhagavansingh (who received the property via a 2012 gift deed), had acquired prescriptive title through continuous possession exceeding the statutory period and had maintained all tax payments. The court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the property, noting the defendants' attempted encroachment with a bulldozer in July 2022 caused damages worth Rs. 25,000. The defendants appeared through counsel but filed no written statement and did not contest the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The suit filed by four plaintiffs for declaration of title to a rice mill property and permanent injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs, as legal heirs of Bhagavansingh (who received the property via a 2012 gift deed), had acquired prescriptive title through continuous possession exceeding the statutory period and had maintained all tax payments. The court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the property, noting the defendants' attempted encroachment with a bulldozer in July 2022 caused damages worth Rs. 25,000. The defendants appeared through counsel but filed no written statement and did not contest the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts