B.Gowsalya Rani and 3 others vs M.Gopalsingh @ Ramgopal singh and 1 another — 252/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or.7 Ru.1, 2 sec.26. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD230005412022
Filing Number
633/2022
Filing Date
29-Aug-2022
Registration No
252/2022
Registration Date
29-Aug-2022
Court
Sub Court, Melur
Judge
2-Sub Judge, Melur
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.B.Gowsalya Rani and 3 others
Adv. V.Nagendran
-
2.B.Jai Karthick singh
-
3.B.Ram Kishan singh
-
4.B.Lakman singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.M.Gopalsingh @ Ramgopal singh and 1 another
-
2.M.Santhar Mansingh
Case History
-
04-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence
Sub Judge, Melur
-
09-Mar-2026
Trial
Sub Judge, Melur
-
11-Feb-2026
Trial
Sub Judge, Melur
-
12-Jan-2026
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
05-Dec-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
17-Nov-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
22-Oct-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
25-Sep-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
08-Aug-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
09-Jul-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
02-Jun-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
26-Mar-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
25-Feb-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
20-Jan-2025
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
12-Dec-2024
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
05-Nov-2024
Await Reports
Sub Judge, Melur
-
23-Oct-2024
Orders
Sub Judge, Melur
-
23-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Sub Judge, Melur
-
03-Sep-2024
Counter
Sub Judge, Melur
-
19-Aug-2024
List / Special List
Sub Judge, Melur
-
06-Aug-2024
List / Special List
Sub Judge, Melur
-
18-Jul-2024
Trial
Sub Judge, Melur
-
01-Jul-2024
Trial
Sub Judge, Melur
-
06-Feb-2024
Trial
Sub Judge, Melur
-
12-Dec-2023
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
16-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Sub Judge, Melur
-
16-Nov-2023
Restored
Sub Judge, Melur
-
16-Nov-2023
Issues
Sub Judge, Melur
-
11-Apr-2023
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: The suit filed by four plaintiffs for declaration of title to a rice mill property and permanent injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs, as legal heirs of Bhagavansingh (who received the property via a 2012 gift deed), had acquired prescriptive title through continuous possession exceeding the statutory period and had maintained all tax payments. The court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the property, noting the defendants' attempted encroachment with a bulldozer in July 2022 caused damages worth Rs. 25,000. The defendants appeared through counsel but filed no written statement and did not contest the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Apr-2023
Disposed
Sub Judge, Melur
-
30-Mar-2023
Arguments
Sub Judge, Melur
-
29-Mar-2023
Arguments
Sub Judge, Melur
-
23-Mar-2023
Arguments
Sub Judge, Melur
-
13-Mar-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
13-Mar-2023
Arguments
Sub Judge, Melur
-
22-Feb-2023
IA Pending
Sub Judge, Melur
-
10-Feb-2023
IA Pending
Sub Judge, Melur
-
24-Jan-2023
IA Pending
Sub Judge, Melur
-
29-Nov-2022
IA Pending
Sub Judge, Melur
-
17-Oct-2022
Issue of Service
Sub Judge, Melur
-
29-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 252/2022
Case Summary: The suit filed by four plaintiffs for declaration of title to a rice mill property and permanent injunction was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs, as legal heirs of Bhagavansingh (who received the property via a 2012 gift deed), had acquired prescriptive title through continuous possession exceeding the statutory period and had maintained all tax payments. The court granted permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of the property, noting the defendants' attempted encroachment with a bulldozer in July 2022 caused damages worth Rs. 25,000. The defendants appeared through counsel but filed no written statement and did not contest the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts