M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., rep by its power of attorney P.Vellaisamy vs A. Ramar and 1 another Advocate - S.P.Kannan — 92/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Or 21 R 11. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 09th March 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNMD230004272022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
503/2022
Filing Date
22-07-2022
Registration No
92/2022
Registration Date
10-11-2022
Court
Sub Court, Melur
Judge
2-Sub Judge, Melur
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CLOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s. Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd., rep by its power of attorney P.Vellaisamy
Adv. R. Rajendraprasad
Respondent(s)
A. Ramar and 1 another Advocate - S.P.Kannan
P.Malaichamy
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur
Disposed
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-01-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim | |
| 12-12-2025 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim | |
| 17-11-2025 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim | |
| 09-10-2025 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Subordinate Judge of Melur terminated the Execution Petition (EP No.92/2022) filed by Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd. against respondents A.Ramar and P.Malaichamy after an S.O.C (Statement of Objections Considered) memo was filed and recorded. No costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Subordinate Judge of Melur terminated the Execution Petition (EP No.92/2022) filed by Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd. against respondents A.Ramar and P.Malaichamy after an S.O.C (Statement of Objections Considered) memo was filed and recorded. No costs were imposed on either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts