S.Jayanthi and 2 others vs R.Deivendran and 3 others — 117/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR7R1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD230003742025
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
440/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
117/2025
Registration Date
03-07-2025
Court
Sub Court, Melur
Judge
2-Sub Judge, Melur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.Jayanthi and 2 others
Adv. VAIRAMANI M
S.Bhuvaneswari
S. Divya
Respondent(s)
R.Deivendran and 3 others
R.Tamilarasu
R.Panaiyanmanivasagan
S. Savithri
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur
Issues
Issues
Orders
Counter
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Issues |
| 24-03-2026 | Issues |
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Counter |
| 17-02-2026 | Counter |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: O.S.No.117/2025, I.A.No.3/2025 - Subordinate Judge, Melur (24.03.2026) Outcome: Petition PARTLY ALLOWED. Ad interim injunction granted only for items 7-9 of suit properties; petition dismissed for items 1-6. No costs awarded. Key Finding: The court held that only items 7, 8, and 9 are ancestral joint family properties where plaintiffs have prima facie rights. Items 1-6 were found to be either self-acquired properties of defendants' mother (purchased from her dowry) or properties originally belonging to a third party (Mrs. Savithri), subsequently sold to defendants via documents dated 28.05.2024. Plaintiffs failed to produce documentary evidence establishing ancestral status for items 1-6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: O.S.No.117/2025, I.A.No.3/2025 - Subordinate Judge, Melur (24.03.2026) Outcome: Petition PARTLY ALLOWED. Ad interim injunction granted only for items 7-9 of suit properties; petition dismissed for items 1-6. No costs awarded. Key Finding: The court held that only items 7, 8, and 9 are ancestral joint family properties where plaintiffs have prima facie rights. Items 1-6 were found to be either self-acquired properties of defendants' mother (purchased from her dowry) or properties originally belonging to a third party (Mrs. Savithri), subsequently sold to defendants via documents dated 28.05.2024. Plaintiffs failed to produce documentary evidence establishing ancestral status for items 1-6. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts