Tamilnad Mercentile Bank vs Sri kanjivanam poultry farm, rep by its properitor — 79/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 37 38. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNMD230003202024

Lok Adalat

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

23-04-2024

Filing Number

386/2024

Filing Date

25-04-2024

Registration No

79/2024

Registration Date

26-04-2024

Court

Sub Court, Melur

Judge

2-Sub Judge, Melur

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section ORDER 21 RULE 37 38

Petitioner(s)

Tamilnad Mercentile Bank

Adv. IYAPPAN R

Respondent(s)

Sri kanjivanam poultry farm, rep by its properitor

E.Saravanan

S.Sri Ajitha

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur

07-04-2026

Lok Adalat

09-03-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

02-02-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

05-01-2026

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

27-11-2025

For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim

Interim Orders

03-04-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

The court order from Sub Judge, Melur (EP No.79/2024 in COS 1/2022) dated 03.04.2025 records the first hearing statement of the petitioner Rajini (TMB Bank Assistant Manager, age 33, from Melur). The petitioner affirmed her initial petition statement as a sworn statement, with all facts therein admitted and signed by her. No documents were marked during this hearing, and the case appears to have been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court order from Sub Judge, Melur (EP No.79/2024 in COS 1/2022) dated 03.04.2025 records the first hearing statement of the petitioner Rajini (TMB Bank Assistant Manager, age 33, from Melur). The petitioner affirmed her initial petition statement as a sworn statement, with all facts therein admitted and signed by her. No documents were marked during this hearing, and the case appears to have been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Melur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case