P. Sivaji Poosari vs The Joint Commissioner and 32 others — 207/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1 27. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

Steps Next hearing 04-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD230003032022

Filing Number

351/2022

Filing Date

02-Jun-2022

Registration No

207/2022

Registration Date

22-Jul-2022

Court

Sub Court, Melur

Judge

2-Sub Judge, Melur

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P. Sivaji Poosari

    Adv. D.Jeyam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Joint Commissioner and 32 others

  2. 2.The Commissioner

  3. 3.R.Saravana pandian

  4. 4.P.M.Jegadish Pandian

  5. 5.R.Rebeelo

  6. 6.P.M.Pandiarajan

  7. 7.N.Karthik

  8. 8.K.Ramesh

  9. 9.V.K.Pandian poosari

  10. 10.P.M.Chellapandi

  11. 11.Fit person

  12. 12.Executive officer

  13. 13.N.pandiarajan

  14. 14.A.Senthilkumar

  15. 15.R.A.Radha

  16. 16.Valli

  17. 17.M.Sumathi

  18. 18.P.Marughupandi

  19. 19.Karthik @ Karthikeyan

  20. 20.Matcharani

  21. 21.Seethalakshmi

  22. 22.Ponnan poosari

  23. 23.Pandiyammal

  24. 24.S.Chandrasekar

  25. 25.V.Muthiah

  26. 26.M.surendran

  27. 27.P.Aravind Pandian

  28. 28.N.Pandiaraj

  29. 29.R.Lakshmi

  30. 30.Ponnupandian

  31. 31.Jayaveerapandi

  32. 32.Rajesh pandi

  33. 33.Rishi pandi

  34. 34.Manikandan poosari

Case History

  1. 04-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Melur

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  8. 11-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  9. 02-Dec-2025

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the defendant's application to dismiss the plaintiff's suit on limitation grounds. Although the suit was filed 862 days after the Commissioner's original order (exceeding the 90-day statutory limit under Section 70 of the Tamil Nadu HR & CE Act), the court held that limitation is a mixed question of law and fact requiring full trial analysis, not preliminary determination. The court also considered the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on court operations and the subsequent erratum order as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 02-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Sub Judge, Melur

  12. 26-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Sub Judge, Melur

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge, Melur

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge, Melur

  15. 04-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    Sub Judge, Melur

  16. 08-Oct-2025

    Counter

    Sub Judge, Melur

  17. 09-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  18. 01-Sep-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  19. 06-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  20. 02-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  21. 22-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  22. 07-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  23. 23-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  24. 04-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  25. 09-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  26. 03-Apr-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  27. 24-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  28. 14-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  29. 05-Feb-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  30. 21-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Sub Judge, Melur

  31. 06-Dec-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge, Melur

  32. 08-Nov-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge, Melur

  33. 23-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge, Melur

  34. 23-Sep-2024

    Issues

    Sub Judge, Melur

  35. 30-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  36. 19-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  37. 12-Jun-2024

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  38. 01-Apr-2024

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  39. 11-Mar-2024

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  40. 26-Feb-2024

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  41. 16-Feb-2024

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  42. 03-Feb-2024

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  43. 12-Jan-2024

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  44. 06-Jan-2024

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  45. 12-Dec-2023

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  46. 08-Nov-2023

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  47. 19-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  48. 10-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  49. 19-Sep-2023

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  50. 02-Sep-2023

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  51. 16-Aug-2023

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  52. 26-Jul-2023

    Amendment

    Sub Judge, Melur

  53. 05-Jul-2023

    IA Pending

    Sub Judge, Melur

  54. 14-Jun-2023

    IA Pending

    Sub Judge, Melur

  55. 20-Apr-2023

    IA Pending

    Sub Judge, Melur

  56. 29-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  57. 08-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  58. 15-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  59. 05-Jan-2023

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  60. 14-Dec-2022

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  61. 30-Nov-2022

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  62. 18-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  63. 05-Sep-2022

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Melur

  64. 22-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 02-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 207/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the defendant's application to dismiss the plaintiff's suit on limitation grounds. Although the suit was filed 862 days after the Commissioner's original order (exceeding the 90-day statutory limit under Section 70 of the Tamil Nadu HR & CE Act), the court held that limitation is a mixed question of law and fact requiring full trial analysis, not preliminary determination. The court also considered the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on court operations and the subsequent erratum order as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case