N.Amutha vs M.Pothumponnu — 52/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section or6 r14A. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 09th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD230001152024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
151/2024
Filing Date
26-02-2024
Registration No
52/2024
Registration Date
26-02-2024
Court
Sub Court, Melur
Judge
2-Sub Judge, Melur
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.Amutha
Adv. K.Boominathan
Respondent(s)
M.Pothumponnu
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur
Disposed
Judgement
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 25-02-2026 | Steps | |
| 13-02-2026 | Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: The Subordinate Court of Melur decreed a mortgage recovery suit filed by N. Amutha against Pothumponnu on April 9, 2026. The court found that the defendant borrowed Rs. 2,50,000 on December 21, 2021, with a registered mortgage deed and promised 18% annual interest, but failed to repay either the principal or interest. The court directed the defendant to pay Rs. 3,48,000 (including accrued interest) within 2 months, with differential interest rates applied, and authorized sale of the mortgaged property to recover the amount, with recourse against the defendant personally if the sale proceeds prove insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Subordinate Court of Melur decreed a mortgage recovery suit filed by N. Amutha against Pothumponnu on April 9, 2026. The court found that the defendant borrowed Rs. 2,50,000 on December 21, 2021, with a registered mortgage deed and promised 18% annual interest, but failed to repay either the principal or interest. The court directed the defendant to pay Rs. 3,48,000 (including accrued interest) within 2 months, with differential interest rates applied, and authorized sale of the mortgaged property to recover the amount, with recourse against the defendant personally if the sale proceeds prove insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts