N.Amutha vs M.Pothumponnu — 52/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section or6 r14A. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 09th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD230001152024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

151/2024

Filing Date

26-02-2024

Registration No

52/2024

Registration Date

26-02-2024

Court

Sub Court, Melur

Judge

2-Sub Judge, Melur

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed with cost

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section or6 r14A

Petitioner(s)

N.Amutha

Adv. K.Boominathan

Respondent(s)

M.Pothumponnu

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Sub Judge, Melur

09-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Judgement

09-03-2026

Steps

25-02-2026

Steps

13-02-2026

Steps

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

SUMMARY: The Subordinate Court of Melur decreed a mortgage recovery suit filed by N. Amutha against Pothumponnu on April 9, 2026. The court found that the defendant borrowed Rs. 2,50,000 on December 21, 2021, with a registered mortgage deed and promised 18% annual interest, but failed to repay either the principal or interest. The court directed the defendant to pay Rs. 3,48,000 (including accrued interest) within 2 months, with differential interest rates applied, and authorized sale of the mortgaged property to recover the amount, with recourse against the defendant personally if the sale proceeds prove insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Subordinate Court of Melur decreed a mortgage recovery suit filed by N. Amutha against Pothumponnu on April 9, 2026. The court found that the defendant borrowed Rs. 2,50,000 on December 21, 2021, with a registered mortgage deed and promised 18% annual interest, but failed to repay either the principal or interest. The court directed the defendant to pay Rs. 3,48,000 (including accrued interest) within 2 months, with differential interest rates applied, and authorized sale of the mortgaged property to recover the amount, with recourse against the defendant personally if the sale proceeds prove insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Melur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case