N.Amutha vs M.Pothumponnu — 52/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section or6 r14A. Disposed: Uncontested--Decreed with cost on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD230001152024

Filing Number

151/2024

Filing Date

26-Feb-2024

Registration No

52/2024

Registration Date

26-Feb-2024

Court

Sub Court, Melur

Judge

2-Sub Judge, Melur

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Decreed with cost

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section or6 r14A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N.Amutha

    Adv. K.Boominathan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M.Pothumponnu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Subordinate Court of Melur decreed a mortgage recovery suit filed by N. Amutha against Pothumponnu on April 9, 2026. The court found that the defendant borrowed Rs. 2,50,000 on December 21, 2021, with a registered mortgage deed and promised 18% annual interest, but failed to repay either the principal or interest. The court directed the defendant to pay Rs. 3,48,000 (including accrued interest) within 2 months, with differential interest rates applied, and authorized sale of the mortgaged property to recover the amount, with recourse against the defendant personally if the sale proceeds prove insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge, Melur

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Melur

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Melur

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Sub Judge, Melur

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Reopen

    Sub Judge, Melur

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Reopen

    Sub Judge, Melur

  11. 06-Dec-2025

    Reopen

    Sub Judge, Melur

  12. 25-Nov-2025

    Reopen

    Sub Judge, Melur

  13. 04-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  14. 24-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Melur

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Melur

  16. 03-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Sub Judge, Melur

  17. 18-Aug-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  19. 03-Jul-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  20. 04-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  22. 21-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  23. 03-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  24. 05-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  25. 03-Jan-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  26. 03-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  27. 09-Dec-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  28. 18-Nov-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  29. 07-Nov-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  30. 18-Oct-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Sub Judge, Melur

  31. 05-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  32. 30-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  33. 27-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Sub Judge, Melur

  34. 24-Apr-2024

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Melur

  35. 28-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Sub Judge, Melur

  36. 26-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 26-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Subordinate Court of Melur decreed a mortgage recovery suit filed by N. Amutha against Pothumponnu on April 9, 2026. The court found that the defendant borrowed Rs. 2,50,000 on December 21, 2021, with a registered mortgage deed and promised 18% annual interest, but failed to repay either the principal or interest. The court directed the defendant to pay Rs. 3,48,000 (including accrued interest) within 2 months, with differential interest rates applied, and authorized sale of the mortgaged property to recover the amount, with recourse against the defendant personally if the sale proceeds prove insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case