Ramkkal vs Mahalakshmi and another — 117/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD190001662024
Filing Number
169/2024
Filing Date
27-Sep-2024
Registration No
117/2024
Registration Date
27-Sep-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramkkal
Adv. Tr.Paramasivam
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahalakshmi and another
-
2.Janarthanan
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
18-Apr-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
23-Mar-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
16-Mar-2026
Issues
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
18-Feb-2026
Issues
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
12-Feb-2026
Issues
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
29-Jan-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Ramkkal v. Mahalakshmi and Another (O.S. 117/2024) Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected Ramkkal's application for temporary injunction restraining respondents from interfering with her property enjoyment pending the main suit's disposal. Reason: The court found that Ramkkal failed to establish the required legal principles for granting temporary injunction—specifically, she did not prove: (1) a prima facie case of legal right, (2) balance of convenience in her favor, or (3) irreparable injury. While both parties claimed overlapping land rights in a 72-cent property at Vadipatti based on competing settlement deeds, the court determined the disputed property's exact location and ownership could only be resolved through evidence at trial, not in this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Jan-2026
Issues
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
12-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
02-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
10-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
02-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
18-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
04-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
07-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
09-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
12-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
22-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
24-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
29-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
01-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
25-Feb-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
28-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
23-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
20-Dec-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
22-Nov-2024
Steps
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
25-Oct-2024
Steps
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
27-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 117/2024
Case Summary: Ramkkal v. Mahalakshmi and Another (O.S. 117/2024) Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected Ramkkal's application for temporary injunction restraining respondents from interfering with her property enjoyment pending the main suit's disposal. Reason: The court found that Ramkkal failed to establish the required legal principles for granting temporary injunction—specifically, she did not prove: (1) a prima facie case of legal right, (2) balance of convenience in her favor, or (3) irreparable injury. While both parties claimed overlapping land rights in a 72-cent property at Vadipatti based on competing settlement deeds, the court determined the disputed property's exact location and ownership could only be resolved through evidence at trial, not in this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts