Senthilkumar vs The District Collector , Madurai — 125/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 R1. Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190001642023

Filing Number

178/2023

Filing Date

13-Oct-2023

Registration No

125/2023

Registration Date

13-Oct-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Dismissed

Last updated 23-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Or 7 R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Senthilkumar

    Adv. Tr.A.Ramakrishnan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector , Madurai

  2. 2.The Tahsildar, Vadipatti

  3. 3.The Block Development Officer, Vadipatti

  4. 4.The Village Administrative Officer, Irumbadi

  5. 5.The President, Irumbadi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed Senthilkumar's suit seeking mandatory and permanent injunctions against government officials for default. The court found that despite sufficient opportunities provided to the plaintiff to proceed with the trial, no progress was made due to lack of representation. The suit was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  11. 14-Aug-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  12. 24-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  13. 19-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  14. 03-Apr-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  15. 27-Feb-2025

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

  16. 27-Feb-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  17. 13-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  18. 05-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  19. 13-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  20. 25-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  21. 28-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  22. 23-Oct-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  23. 12-Sep-2024

    Issues

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  24. 05-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  25. 21-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  26. 31-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  27. 15-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  28. 18-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  29. 22-Apr-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  30. 28-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  31. 12-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  32. 14-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  33. 10-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  34. 04-Dec-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  35. 21-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  36. 10-Nov-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  37. 13-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 13-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 125/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed Senthilkumar's suit seeking mandatory and permanent injunctions against government officials for default. The court found that despite sufficient opportunities provided to the plaintiff to proceed with the trial, no progress was made due to lack of representation. The suit was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case