Indirani and one another vs A. Ramayya and 3 others — 92/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190001242022

For further Proceedings

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

Filing Number

152/2022

Filing Date

06-07-2022

Registration No

92/2022

Registration Date

06-07-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Indirani and one another

Adv. Tr. T. Sivananthan

M.Kalaiarasi

Respondent(s)

A. Ramayya and 3 others

A. Nagarahinam

N.Athishesan

N. Balakrishnan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

27-03-2026

For further Proceedings

07-03-2026

For further Proceedings

16-02-2026

For further Proceedings

07-02-2026

Stay

30-01-2026

Stay

Interim Orders

04-08-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti allowed the petition filed by Indrani and Kalaiarasi under Order IX Rule 9 of CPC to set aside the dismissal order dated 06.11.2024 and restore their temporary injunction petition (IA No.329/2022). The court found the petitioners' reason for non-appearance—illness of the second petitioner—to be convincing and sufficient cause, with no hardship caused to respondents by allowing the petition. The petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500 to the respondents before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti allowed the petition filed by Indrani and Kalaiarasi under Order IX Rule 9 of CPC to set aside the dismissal order dated 06.11.2024 and restore their temporary injunction petition (IA No.329/2022). The court found the petitioners' reason for non-appearance—illness of the second petitioner—to be convincing and sufficient cause, with no hardship caused to respondents by allowing the petition. The petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500 to the respondents before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case