Indirani and one another vs A. Ramayya and 3 others — 92/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

For further Proceedings Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190001242022

Filing Number

152/2022

Filing Date

06-Jul-2022

Registration No

92/2022

Registration Date

06-Jul-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Indirani and one another

    Adv. Tr. T. Sivananthan

  2. 2.M.Kalaiarasi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A. Ramayya and 3 others

  2. 2.A. Nagarahinam

  3. 3.N.Athishesan

  4. 4.N. Balakrishnan

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Stay

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Stay

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  11. 15-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  13. 20-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  14. 15-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  15. 18-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  16. 04-Aug-2025

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

  17. 04-Aug-2025

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti allowed the petition filed by Indrani and Kalaiarasi under Order IX Rule 9 of CPC to set aside the dismissal order dated 06.11.2024 and restore their temporary injunction petition (IA No.329/2022). The court found the petitioners' reason for non-appearance—illness of the second petitioner—to be convincing and sufficient cause, with no hardship caused to respondents by allowing the petition. The petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500 to the respondents before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 04-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  19. 23-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  20. 09-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  21. 25-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  22. 23-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  23. 09-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  24. 24-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  25. 10-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  26. 24-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  27. 10-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  28. 06-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  29. 06-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  30. 15-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  31. 23-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  32. 29-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  33. 02-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  34. 08-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  35. 18-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  36. 03-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  37. 20-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  38. 05-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  39. 14-Feb-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  40. 22-Jan-2024

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  41. 21-Dec-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  42. 05-Dec-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  43. 15-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  44. 14-Nov-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  45. 17-Oct-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  46. 20-Sep-2023

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  47. 31-Aug-2023

    Batta

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  48. 16-Aug-2023

    Batta

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  49. 26-Jul-2023

    Batta

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  50. 10-Jul-2023

    Batta

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  51. 13-Jun-2023

    Batta

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  52. 08-Jun-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  53. 19-Apr-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  54. 28-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  55. 14-Mar-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  56. 07-Mar-2023

    Steps

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  57. 08-Feb-2023

    Steps

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  58. 05-Jan-2023

    Batta

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  59. 16-Dec-2022

    Batta

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  60. 21-Nov-2022

    Batta

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  61. 19-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  62. 06-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  63. 27-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 06-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 92/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti allowed the petition filed by Indrani and Kalaiarasi under Order IX Rule 9 of CPC to set aside the dismissal order dated 06.11.2024 and restore their temporary injunction petition (IA No.329/2022). The court found the petitioners' reason for non-appearance—illness of the second petitioner—to be convincing and sufficient cause, with no hardship caused to respondents by allowing the petition. The petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 500 to the respondents before the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case