KANJANA AND ANOTHER vs ATHIMUTHIAN 4 OTHERS — 102/2011

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 25(d). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 20-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190001232011

Filing Number

102/2011

Filing Date

06-Jun-2011

Registration No

102/2011

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 25(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANJANA AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.MADAHVAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ATHIMUTHIAN 4 OTHERS

  2. 2.THANDEESWARAN

  3. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

  4. 4.THE TAHSILDAR

  5. 5.THE VILLAGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  11. 05-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  12. 26-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  13. 20-Feb-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The petition for appointment of an advocate commissioner to inspect the disputed property and identify encroachment was dismissed by the District Munsif Court, Vadipatti on 20 February 2026. The court held that appointing an advocate commissioner was unnecessary since the plaintiff's claims regarding government pathway and encroachment could be adequately proven through documentary evidence, revenue records, and photographs during the main trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 20-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  15. 17-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  16. 16-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  17. 10-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  18. 06-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  19. 02-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  20. 27-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  21. 23-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  22. 19-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  23. 08-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  24. 06-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  25. 02-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  26. 12-Dec-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  27. 26-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  28. 21-Nov-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  29. 17-Nov-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  30. 10-Nov-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  31. 31-Oct-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  32. 24-Oct-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  33. 09-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 06-Jun-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. 102/2011

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The petition for appointment of an advocate commissioner to inspect the disputed property and identify encroachment was dismissed by the District Munsif Court, Vadipatti on 20 February 2026. The court held that appointing an advocate commissioner was unnecessary since the plaintiff's claims regarding government pathway and encroachment could be adequately proven through documentary evidence, revenue records, and photographs during the main trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case