RAJKUMAR T vs BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AND ANOTHER — 112/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Trial Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190001222025

e-Filing Number

11-09-2025

Filing Number

121/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

112/2025

Registration Date

11-Sep-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Last updated 14-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJKUMAR T

    Adv. MUTHUPANDY R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR MADURAI

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/Order

    CASE SUMMARY: OS 112/2025 Petition dismissed. Rajkumar sought temporary injunction against state officials, claiming he inherited agricultural property through a 2017 partition and possessed it lawfully, but the Block Development Officer unlawfully attempted eviction claiming the land was government property earmarked as a common water source. Court dismissed the petition, finding Rajkumar failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three mandatory criteria for temporary injunction—as he produced no documentary evidence supporting his title or possession claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  12. 01-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  13. 27-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: OS 112/2025 Petition dismissed. Rajkumar sought temporary injunction against state officials, claiming he inherited agricultural property through a 2017 partition and possessed it lawfully, but the Block Development Officer unlawfully attempted eviction claiming the land was government property earmarked as a common water source. Court dismissed the petition, finding Rajkumar failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three mandatory criteria for temporary injunction—as he produced no documentary evidence supporting his title or possession claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case