AYYAVU R vs Village Administrative Officer and 3 Others — 106/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U/s 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190001122025

Trial

Next Hearing

31st July 2026

e-Filing Number

12-08-2025

Filing Number

111/2025

Filing Date

12-08-2025

Registration No

106/2025

Registration Date

13-08-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section U/s 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

AYYAVU R

Adv. SENTHUR PANDIAN S

Respondent(s)

Village Administrative Officer and 3 Others

Tasildar of vadipatti

Executive officer of vadipatti townpanchayat

The District Collector of Madurai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

12-06-2026

Trial

27-04-2026

Trial

23-03-2026

Trial

16-03-2026

Trial

07-02-2026

Trial

Interim Orders

10-09-2025
Copy of Decree
10-09-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: AYYAVU R v. Village Administrative Officer and Others (OS No. 106/2025) Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court rejected petitioner Ayyavu's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain government officials from interfering with his property possession in survey number S.No.364/2. The court found petitioner failed to establish the three mandatory requirements for temporary injunction: (1) prima facie case of legal right, (2) balance of convenience in his favor, and (3) risk of irreparable injury. Although petitioner proved possession of 1 cent through patta and property tax receipts, he provided no evidence that respondents actually attempted to dispossess him. The court noted respondent's High Court writ petition on similar grounds was dismissed, and that Fire Service Department allotment concerned neighboring land S.No.364/1, not the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: AYYAVU R v. Village Administrative Officer and Others (OS No. 106/2025) Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court rejected petitioner Ayyavu's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain government officials from interfering with his property possession in survey number S.No.364/2. The court found petitioner failed to establish the three mandatory requirements for temporary injunction: (1) prima facie case of legal right, (2) balance of convenience in his favor, and (3) risk of irreparable injury. Although petitioner proved possession of 1 cent through patta and property tax receipts, he provided no evidence that respondents actually attempted to dispossess him. The court noted respondent's High Court writ petition on similar grounds was dismissed, and that Fire Service Department allotment concerned neighboring land S.No.364/1, not the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case