AYYAVU R vs Village Administrative Officer and 3 Others — 106/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD190001122025
e-Filing Number
12-08-2025
Filing Number
111/2025
Filing Date
12-Aug-2025
Registration No
106/2025
Registration Date
13-Aug-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AYYAVU R
Adv. SENTHUR PANDIAN S
Respondent(s)
-
1.Village Administrative Officer and 3 Others
-
2.Tasildar of vadipatti
-
3.Executive officer of vadipatti townpanchayat
-
4.The District Collector of Madurai
Case History
-
31-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
27-Apr-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
23-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
16-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
07-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
03-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
26-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
15-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
10-Sep-2025
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
10-Sep-2025
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: AYYAVU R v. Village Administrative Officer and Others (OS No. 106/2025) Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court rejected petitioner Ayyavu's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain government officials from interfering with his property possession in survey number S.No.364/2. The court found petitioner failed to establish the three mandatory requirements for temporary injunction: (1) prima facie case of legal right, (2) balance of convenience in his favor, and (3) risk of irreparable injury. Although petitioner proved possession of 1 cent through patta and property tax receipts, he provided no evidence that respondents actually attempted to dispossess him. The court noted respondent's High Court writ petition on similar grounds was dismissed, and that Fire Service Department allotment concerned neighboring land S.No.364/1, not the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Sep-2025
Issues
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
03-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
20-Aug-2025
Written Statement
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
13-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 106/2025
Case Summary: AYYAVU R v. Village Administrative Officer and Others (OS No. 106/2025) Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court rejected petitioner Ayyavu's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain government officials from interfering with his property possession in survey number S.No.364/2. The court found petitioner failed to establish the three mandatory requirements for temporary injunction: (1) prima facie case of legal right, (2) balance of convenience in his favor, and (3) risk of irreparable injury. Although petitioner proved possession of 1 cent through patta and property tax receipts, he provided no evidence that respondents actually attempted to dispossess him. The court noted respondent's High Court writ petition on similar grounds was dismissed, and that Fire Service Department allotment concerned neighboring land S.No.364/1, not the suit property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts