Nagadevan and 3 others vs Karnan and 1 other — 56/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 27(c). Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD190000872024
Filing Number
90/2024
Filing Date
19-Jul-2024
Registration No
56/2024
Registration Date
19-Jul-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nagadevan and 3 others
Adv. Tr.Muthupandy
-
2.Ramesh
-
3.Lokumani
-
4.Vettriselvan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Karnan and 1 other
-
2.Mayan
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Await Reports
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
23-Apr-2026
Await Reports
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
23-Mar-2026
Await Reports
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
16-Mar-2026
Await Reports
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
24-Feb-2026
Await Reports
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
10-Feb-2026
Await Reports
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
18-Dec-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
27-Nov-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
16-Oct-2025
Await Reports
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
28-Aug-2025
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
06-Aug-2025
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: OS 56/2024 - Nagadevan & Others v. Karnan & Another The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed the petitioners' application for temporary injunction on 06.08.2025. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from interfering with their possession of agricultural property, claiming the respondents had blocked a stream and attempted encroachment. The court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three mandatory conditions for granting temporary injunction—as neither party presented evidence during proceedings. Petition dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Aug-2025
Compliance
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
23-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
09-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
02-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
25-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
09-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
21-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
27-Mar-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
18-Mar-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
25-Feb-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
28-Jan-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
03-Dec-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
11-Nov-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
21-Oct-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
23-Sep-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
16-Aug-2024
Issue of Service
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
19-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2024
Case Summary: OS 56/2024 - Nagadevan & Others v. Karnan & Another The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed the petitioners' application for temporary injunction on 06.08.2025. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from interfering with their possession of agricultural property, claiming the respondents had blocked a stream and attempted encroachment. The court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three mandatory conditions for granting temporary injunction—as neither party presented evidence during proceedings. Petition dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts