Nagadevan and 3 others vs Karnan and 1 other — 56/2024
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD190000872024
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
90/2024
Filing Date
19-07-2024
Registration No
56/2024
Registration Date
19-07-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nagadevan and 3 others
Adv. Tr.Muthupandy
Ramesh
Lokumani
Vettriselvan
Respondent(s)
Karnan and 1 other
Mayan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Await Reports |
| 23-04-2026 | Await Reports |
| 23-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 16-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 24-02-2026 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 56/2024 - Nagadevan & Others v. Karnan & Another The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed the petitioners' application for temporary injunction on 06.08.2025. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from interfering with their possession of agricultural property, claiming the respondents had blocked a stream and attempted encroachment. The court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three mandatory conditions for granting temporary injunction—as neither party presented evidence during proceedings. Petition dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 56/2024 - Nagadevan & Others v. Karnan & Another The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed the petitioners' application for temporary injunction on 06.08.2025. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from interfering with their possession of agricultural property, claiming the respondents had blocked a stream and attempted encroachment. The court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three mandatory conditions for granting temporary injunction—as neither party presented evidence during proceedings. Petition dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts