Nagadevan and 3 others vs Karnan and 1 other — 56/2024

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190000872024

Await Reports

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

90/2024

Filing Date

19-07-2024

Registration No

56/2024

Registration Date

19-07-2024

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 27(c)

Petitioner(s)

Nagadevan and 3 others

Adv. Tr.Muthupandy

Ramesh

Lokumani

Vettriselvan

Respondent(s)

Karnan and 1 other

Mayan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

27-04-2026

Await Reports

23-04-2026

Await Reports

23-03-2026

Await Reports

16-03-2026

Await Reports

24-02-2026

Await Reports

Interim Orders

06-08-2025
Copy of Decree
06-08-2025
Copy of Decree
06-08-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: OS 56/2024 - Nagadevan & Others v. Karnan & Another The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed the petitioners' application for temporary injunction on 06.08.2025. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from interfering with their possession of agricultural property, claiming the respondents had blocked a stream and attempted encroachment. The court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three mandatory conditions for granting temporary injunction—as neither party presented evidence during proceedings. Petition dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 56/2024 - Nagadevan & Others v. Karnan & Another The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed the petitioners' application for temporary injunction on 06.08.2025. The petitioners sought to restrain respondents from interfering with their possession of agricultural property, claiming the respondents had blocked a stream and attempted encroachment. The court found the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable injury—the three mandatory conditions for granting temporary injunction—as neither party presented evidence during proceedings. Petition dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case