Pitchai vs Sadayandi and 4 others Advocate - Vallinayagam — 1000174/2009
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD190000862009
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
29-10-2009
Registration No
1000174/2009
Registration Date
29-10-2009
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pitchai
Adv. N.C.R. Janakar
Respondent(s)
Sadayandi and 4 others Advocate - Vallinayagam
Kumarayi
Alagammal
Velan
Adv. Vellinayagam
Karuppayi
Ranjithkumar
Sub Registrar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Compliance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-03-2026 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition record (not a case judgment or order), dated 30.01.2026, from OS No. 174/2009 in the District Munsif Court, T. Vadipatti, Madurai District. The witness (PW1), a 47-year-old male, provided sworn testimony regarding property matters, including questions about property documents, their ownership status, and a property sale on 08.08.2008. No specific court order (such as bail granted/denied or petition allowed/dismissed) is issued in this document—it merely records the witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition record (not a case judgment or order), dated 30.01.2026, from OS No. 174/2009 in the District Munsif Court, T. Vadipatti, Madurai District. The witness (PW1), a 47-year-old male, provided sworn testimony regarding property matters, including questions about property documents, their ownership status, and a property sale on 08.08.2008. No specific court order (such as bail granted/denied or petition allowed/dismissed) is issued in this document—it merely records the witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts