S. Rajakkani vs S. Chinnathai (Died) and 21 others — 1000008/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 21. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNMD190000812018
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
81/2018
Filing Date
04-06-2018
Registration No
1000008/2018
Registration Date
06-06-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S. Rajakkani
Adv. S. Goodwin Solemnraj
Respondent(s)
S. Chinnathai (Died) and 21 others
S. Vadivel Murugan (Died)
S. Mariyappan
Sivapackiyam
P. Karuppannan
A. Murugesan (Died)
M. Perumal
Amsavalli.V
Subbulakshmi.V
Madasamy.V
V.Rajadhran
R.Malathi
R.Kingu @ Kishore
R.Janai
Muthaiee (Died)
Kannan
Ganesan
Gajenthran
Kumar
Mariyammal
Ithurani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Amendment
EA Pending
EA Pending
EA Pending
EA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 23-03-2026 | EA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | EA Pending |
| 07-03-2026 | EA Pending |
| 03-03-2026 | EA Pending |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti allowed the petitioner's amendment petition (EA No. 2 of 2026) filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. The petitioner, a decree holder in OS No. 190/2008 for partition and possession of 1/5th property share, sought to amend the execution petition schedule with corrected property particulars that were unavailable at the time of filing. The court disregarded respondents' contentions challenging the petitioner's rightful claim, finding such disputes subject to proof in the original suit or appeal, and directed the petitioner to file the amended particulars before the next hearing date in the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti allowed the petitioner's amendment petition (EA No. 2 of 2026) filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. The petitioner, a decree holder in OS No. 190/2008 for partition and possession of 1/5th property share, sought to amend the execution petition schedule with corrected property particulars that were unavailable at the time of filing. The court disregarded respondents' contentions challenging the petitioner's rightful claim, finding such disputes subject to proof in the original suit or appeal, and directed the petitioner to file the amended particulars before the next hearing date in the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts