K. Nagalingam vs P. Karuppu alias Karuppaiah and 11 others Advocate - R. Muthumani — 35/2020
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 27(c). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD190000552020
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
66/2020
Filing Date
24-06-2020
Registration No
35/2020
Registration Date
24-06-2020
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K. Nagalingam
Adv. C. Kannan
Respondent(s)
P. Karuppu alias Karuppaiah and 11 others Advocate - R. Muthumani
S. Ponnuchamy
Adv. R. Muthumani
V. Mahamani
V. Mahamani
S. Ponnar
M. Mariyappan
A. Pitchaiyammal
K. Karnan
C. Ashokkumar
K. Periyakaruppu alias Seevatti
P. Rajamanickam
M. Premkumar
M. Muthupillai
Adv. R. Rajkumar
M. Thenmozhi
Adv. R. Rajkumar
M. Murugesan
Adv. R. Rajkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Evidence
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 10-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 06-04-2026 | Part Heard |
| 24-03-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness deposition (PW 2) in civil suit O.S. No. 35/2020 before the District Munsif Court, T. Vadipatti, Madurai District, recorded on 29.04.2026. The witness, V. Palaniandi (age 75), testified regarding a property dispute involving temple land purchase and priestly rights, providing cross-examination responses about the acquisition of land (Thava Saathu), temple constructions, and the plaintiff's claim to hereditary priesthood. The testimony was recorded in Tamil, transcribed, and certified by the judge M.P. Ramkishore. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness deposition (PW 2) in civil suit O.S. No. 35/2020 before the District Munsif Court, T. Vadipatti, Madurai District, recorded on 29.04.2026. The witness, V. Palaniandi (age 75), testified regarding a property dispute involving temple land purchase and priestly rights, providing cross-examination responses about the acquisition of land (Thava Saathu), temple constructions, and the plaintiff's claim to hereditary priesthood. The testimony was recorded in Tamil, transcribed, and certified by the judge M.P. Ramkishore. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts