KESAVAN C vs R.ALAGARKUMAR — 45/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD190000442025
e-Filing Number
19-03-2025
Filing Number
44/2025
Filing Date
19-Mar-2025
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
19-Mar-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KESAVAN C
Adv. M SADAIMUNI
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.ALAGARKUMAR
Case History
-
08-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
25-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
07-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
02-Dec-2025
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Copy of DecreeView PDF
SUMMARY: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed the petitioner C. Kesavan's petition for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of CPC, which sought to restrain the respondent R. Alagarkumar from interfering with the petitioner's enjoyment of the disputed property. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Dec-2025
Issues
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
17-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
03-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
25-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
09-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
16-Sep-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
19-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
05-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
08-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
17-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
15-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
19-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 45/2025
SUMMARY: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed the petitioner C. Kesavan's petition for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of CPC, which sought to restrain the respondent R. Alagarkumar from interfering with the petitioner's enjoyment of the disputed property. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts