T. Amaravathi vs Tamil Nadu rep. Through its Panchayat President, Kadupatti Panchayat, and 3 others — 29/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 27(c). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD190000412023
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
50/2023
Filing Date
05-04-2023
Registration No
29/2023
Registration Date
05-04-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T. Amaravathi
Adv. Tr. M. Vellaisamy
Respondent(s)
Tamil Nadu rep. Through its Panchayat President, Kadupatti Panchayat, and 3 others
State of Tamil Nadu rep., through its, The Block Development Officer
State of Tamil Nadu rep., by its, The Thasildhar
State of Tamil Nadu rep., thorugh its, The District Collector
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-03-2026 | Trial | |
| 09-02-2026 | Trial | |
| 10-12-2025 | Trial | |
| 29-10-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: The temporary injunction petition (I.A. No. 02/2023) filed by T. Amaravathi against the Government of Tamil Nadu was ALLOWED. The District Munsif Court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed property (Survey Nos. 566, 567, and 566/37) until disposal of the main suit for permanent injunction. The court found a prima facie case in the petitioner's favor, noting the respondents admitted her patta (ownership) for two of the three property items and finding the respondents' removal notice defective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The temporary injunction petition (I.A. No. 02/2023) filed by T. Amaravathi against the Government of Tamil Nadu was ALLOWED. The District Munsif Court granted a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed property (Survey Nos. 566, 567, and 566/37) until disposal of the main suit for permanent injunction. The court found a prima facie case in the petitioner's favor, noting the respondents admitted her patta (ownership) for two of the three property items and finding the respondents' removal notice defective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts