Murugesan vs Thasildar — 1/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Sec 386. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
SOP - Succession Original Petition
CNR: TNMD190000402024
Filing Number
43/2024
Filing Date
10-Apr-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
05-Aug-2024
Court
District Munsif Court, Vadipatti
Judge
1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.
Last updated 19-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Murugesan
Adv. K. Balamurugan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Thasildar
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
21-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Summary: This is a witness deposition record (PW2) in S.O.P. No. 1/2024 before the District Munsif Court, T. Vadipatti, Madurai District, dated 21.01.2026. The 44-year-old witness (Alaghar) testified on behalf of the petitioner, affirming his statement under oath and providing examination-in-chief evidence. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was challenged due to his lack of direct knowledge of relevant facts and his relationship with the petitioner, with the court noting concerns about the reliability of his testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
24-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
24-Nov-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
14-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
24-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
10-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
26-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
12-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
29-Aug-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
25-Aug-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
19-Aug-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
05-Aug-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
22-Jul-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
22-Jul-2025
Part Heard
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
08-Jul-2025
Enquiry
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
01-Jul-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
27-Jun-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
20-Jun-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
06-Jun-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
24-Apr-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
16-Apr-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
28-Mar-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
21-Mar-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
07-Feb-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
10-Jan-2025
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
16-Dec-2024
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
11-Dec-2024
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
13-Nov-2024
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
17-Oct-2024
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
23-Sep-2024
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
27-Aug-2024
Counter
District Munsif, Vadipatti.
-
05-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2024
Summary: This is a witness deposition record (PW2) in S.O.P. No. 1/2024 before the District Munsif Court, T. Vadipatti, Madurai District, dated 21.01.2026. The 44-year-old witness (Alaghar) testified on behalf of the petitioner, affirming his statement under oath and providing examination-in-chief evidence. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was challenged due to his lack of direct knowledge of relevant facts and his relationship with the petitioner, with the court noting concerns about the reliability of his testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts