Laxmi vs Karthigaimurugan and 5 others — 23/2025

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U/s 25(a),U/s 25 (d). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190000212025

Trial

Next Hearing

04th July 2026

e-Filing Number

29-01-2025

Filing Number

21/2025

Filing Date

01-02-2025

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

01-02-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section U/s 25(a),U/s 25 (d)

Petitioner(s)

Laxmi

Adv. M Vellaichamy

Respondent(s)

Karthigaimurugan and 5 others

The District collector madurai

The Dasildhar Vadipatti

Executive officer palamedu town panchayat

Head Surveyor Vadipatii Taluka

Subregistrar Alanganallur

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

12-06-2026

Trial

22-04-2026

Trial

15-04-2026

Trial

23-03-2026

Issues

16-03-2026

Written Statement

Interim Orders

29-01-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: OS No. 23/2025 The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed a petition filed by defendant S. Karthikar Murugan under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC seeking rejection of the plaint filed by plaintiff Lakshmi for declaration and injunction regarding disputed property. The defendant argued the suit lacked cause of action based on res judicata from a prior decree (OS No. 104/2020) and claimed oral partition rights to the disputed property item. The court held that the defendant's arguments raised new factual disputes regarding title and possession that cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage; these issues require trial on merits. The petition was dismissed as it failed to identify any deficiency in the plaint itself falling within Order 7 Rule 11 grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 23/2025 The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed a petition filed by defendant S. Karthikar Murugan under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC seeking rejection of the plaint filed by plaintiff Lakshmi for declaration and injunction regarding disputed property. The defendant argued the suit lacked cause of action based on res judicata from a prior decree (OS No. 104/2020) and claimed oral partition rights to the disputed property item. The court held that the defendant's arguments raised new factual disputes regarding title and possession that cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage; these issues require trial on merits. The petition was dismissed as it failed to identify any deficiency in the plaint itself falling within Order 7 Rule 11 grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case