Laxmi vs Karthigaimurugan and 5 others — 23/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 25(a),U/s 25 (d). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

Trial Next hearing 04-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190000212025

e-Filing Number

29-01-2025

Filing Number

21/2025

Filing Date

01-Feb-2025

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

01-Feb-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s 25(a),U/s 25 (d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Laxmi

    Adv. M Vellaichamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karthigaimurugan and 5 others

  2. 2.The District collector madurai

  3. 3.The Dasildhar Vadipatti

  4. 4.Executive officer palamedu town panchayat

  5. 5.Head Surveyor Vadipatii Taluka

  6. 6.Subregistrar Alanganallur

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 23/2025 The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed a petition filed by defendant S. Karthikar Murugan under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC seeking rejection of the plaint filed by plaintiff Lakshmi for declaration and injunction regarding disputed property. The defendant argued the suit lacked cause of action based on res judicata from a prior decree (OS No. 104/2020) and claimed oral partition rights to the disputed property item. The court held that the defendant's arguments raised new factual disputes regarding title and possession that cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage; these issues require trial on merits. The petition was dismissed as it failed to identify any deficiency in the plaint itself falling within Order 7 Rule 11 grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  12. 02-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  13. 16-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  15. 02-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  16. 27-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  18. 06-Nov-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  19. 15-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  20. 17-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  21. 03-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  22. 26-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  23. 07-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  24. 04-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  25. 30-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  26. 28-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  27. 14-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  28. 11-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  29. 08-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  30. 24-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  31. 21-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  32. 17-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  33. 15-Apr-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  34. 27-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  35. 28-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  36. 01-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 01-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 23/2025 The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti dismissed a petition filed by defendant S. Karthikar Murugan under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC seeking rejection of the plaint filed by plaintiff Lakshmi for declaration and injunction regarding disputed property. The defendant argued the suit lacked cause of action based on res judicata from a prior decree (OS No. 104/2020) and claimed oral partition rights to the disputed property item. The court held that the defendant's arguments raised new factual disputes regarding title and possession that cannot be decided at the plaint rejection stage; these issues require trial on merits. The petition was dismissed as it failed to identify any deficiency in the plaint itself falling within Order 7 Rule 11 grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case