Rajammal vs Seenivasan — 28/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190000202023

Filing Number

23/2023

Filing Date

27-Mar-2023

Registration No

28/2023

Registration Date

30-Mar-2023

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 25(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajammal

    Adv. Tr. M. Ilangovan, B.Sc., B.L.,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Seenivasan

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  3. 07-Feb-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  4. 05-Jan-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  6. 31-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  7. 26-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  9. 25-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  10. 20-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  11. 07-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  12. 03-Mar-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  13. 27-Jan-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  14. 09-Dec-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  15. 11-Nov-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  16. 30-Oct-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  17. 24-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  18. 19-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  19. 22-Aug-2024

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary: The petition filed by Rajammal seeking appointment of an advocate commissioner to inspect, measure, and survey the disputed property was dismissed by the District Munsif Court on 22 August 2024. The court held that appointing an advocate commissioner would amount to collecting evidence, which is impermissible under CPC Order 26 Rule 9, and that the plaintiff must prove her title and the property's boundaries through witness examination instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 22-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  21. 08-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  22. 07-Aug-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  23. 04-Jul-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  24. 06-Jun-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  25. 02-Apr-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  26. 18-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  27. 04-Mar-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  28. 08-Feb-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  29. 23-Jan-2024

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  30. 14-Dec-2023

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  31. 07-Dec-2023

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  32. 02-Nov-2023

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  33. 30-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  34. 09-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  35. 05-Oct-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  36. 18-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  37. 07-Sep-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  38. 21-Aug-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  39. 27-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  40. 18-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  41. 03-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  42. 27-Apr-2023

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  43. 30-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 27-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Rajammal seeking appointment of an advocate commissioner to inspect, measure, and survey the disputed property was dismissed by the District Munsif Court on 22 August 2024. The court held that appointing an advocate commissioner would amount to collecting evidence, which is impermissible under CPC Order 26 Rule 9, and that the plaintiff must prove her title and the property's boundaries through witness examination instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case