G.Sanglipandi vs Nellamagam and 4 others — 8/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s.27(c). Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

IA Pending Next hearing 24-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNMD190000062025

Filing Number

6/2025

Filing Date

07-Jan-2025

Registration No

8/2025

Registration Date

07-Jan-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Vadipatti

Judge

1-District Munsif, Vadipatti.

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s.27(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.Sanglipandi

    Adv. ARUMUGAM A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nellamagam and 4 others

  2. 2.Karmagakannan

  3. 3.Chinnaiyan

  4. 4.Ramar

  5. 5.N.Karuppusamy

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  6. 07-Jan-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  9. 05-Nov-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  10. 08-Oct-2025

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti, dismissed the petitioner's application (IA No.2/2025) for temporary injunction dated October 8, 2025. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish the three essential criteria for granting temporary injunction: (1) prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience, and (3) irreparable injury. The respondents had produced evidence, including a Tahsildar's order (dated 01.11.2024) permitting them to worship the temple deity, which contradicted the petitioner's exclusive ownership claim, resulting in dismissal with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Issues

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  13. 22-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  14. 17-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  15. 10-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  16. 26-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  17. 05-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  18. 15-Jul-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  19. 17-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  20. 29-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  21. 01-Apr-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  22. 04-Mar-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  23. 04-Feb-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif, Vadipatti.

  24. 07-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 07-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Petition Dismissed: The District Munsif Court, Vadipatti, dismissed the petitioner's application (IA No.2/2025) for temporary injunction dated October 8, 2025. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish the three essential criteria for granting temporary injunction: (1) prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience, and (3) irreparable injury. The respondents had produced evidence, including a Tahsildar's order (dated 01.11.2024) permitting them to worship the temple deity, which contradicted the petitioner's exclusive ownership claim, resulting in dismissal with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case