SI of Police uthappanaickanur PS vs Chinnasamy and 2 Others — 401/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD180014942025

e-Filing Number

17-06-2025

Filing Number

1490/2025

Filing Date

17-Jun-2025

Registration No

401/2025

Registration Date

17-Jun-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Usilampatti

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

215

Police Station

UTHAPANAICKANUR

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of Police uthappanaickanur PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chinnasamy and 2 Others

  2. 2.Santhi

  3. 3.Keresh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all three accused (Chinnasamy, Santhi, and Keresh) of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPHW Act section 4, finding them not guilty. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the main victim-witness (PW1) admitted to entering into compromise with the accused and providing exaggerated facts, while other eyewitnesses turned hostile and provided no credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged assault incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  11. 07-Oct-2025

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  12. 17-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 17-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 401/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted all three accused (Chinnasamy, Santhi, and Keresh) of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPHW Act section 4, finding them not guilty. The court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the main victim-witness (PW1) admitted to entering into compromise with the accused and providing exaggerated facts, while other eyewitnesses turned hostile and provided no credible evidence linking the accused to the alleged assault incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case