CHECKANURANI POLICE STATION vs Saravanan and 4 Others Advocate - Meenatchisundaram — 224/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,294(b),506(ii),148,147,427. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 26-May-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD180007652025

Filing Number

762/2025

Filing Date

25-Oct-2018

Registration No

224/2025

Registration Date

25-Oct-2018

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Usilampatti

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

89

Police Station

CHECKANURANI

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,294(b),506(ii),148,147,427

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHECKANURANI POLICE STATION

    Adv. APP2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saravanan and 4 Others Advocate - Meenatchisundaram

  2. 2.Sarasammal

  3. 3.Jeeva

  4. 4.Jansi

Case History

  1. 26-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  10. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  11. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  12. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  14. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  15. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  16. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  17. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  18. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  19. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  20. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  21. 29-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  22. 24-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  23. 12-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  24. 05-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  25. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  26. 22-Apr-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary: This document contains witness depositions (P.W. 1-4) recorded on 22.04.2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Usilampatti in Case No. C.C - 224/2025. The witnesses testified regarding an incident on 30.01.2017 where the accused allegedly attacked the complainant's group with weapons (sickles, knives, and sticks) at their garden, used abusive language, made death threats, and damaged saplings. However, all prosecution witnesses admitted during cross-examination that they have since reconciled with the accused and now support them, thereby undermining the prosecution's case. The accused were present during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  28. 07-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 25-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 224/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This document contains witness depositions (P.W. 1-4) recorded on 22.04.2025 before the Judicial Magistrate Court II, Usilampatti in Case No. C.C - 224/2025. The witnesses testified regarding an incident on 30.01.2017 where the accused allegedly attacked the complainant's group with weapons (sickles, knives, and sticks) at their garden, used abusive language, made death threats, and damaged saplings. However, all prosecution witnesses admitted during cross-examination that they have since reconciled with the accused and now support them, thereby undermining the prosecution's case. The accused were present during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case