Sub Inspector of Police Elumalai P.S. vs Saminathan — 64/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 29-May-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD180004002021

Filing Number

400/2021

Filing Date

28-Jul-2021

Registration No

64/2021

Registration Date

28-Jul-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Usilampatti

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1839

Police Station

ELUMALAI

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),324,506(i)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police Elumalai P.S.

    Adv. APP2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Saminathan

Case History

  1. 29-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary Case: CC 64/2021, Judicial Magistrate Court II, Usilampatti Outcome: A petition filed by the accused (who was absent) was allowed by the court. The witness (PW1) provided deposition on 24.03.2026, testifying that the accused assaulted the witness, his wife, and daughter with a stick six years prior, causing injuries. The cross-examination of the accused was noted as "nil." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  7. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  9. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  10. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  11. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  12. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  13. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  14. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  15. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  16. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  17. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  18. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  19. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  20. 05-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  21. 24-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  22. 13-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  23. 25-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  24. 13-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  25. 27-Apr-2023

    Evidence

  26. 09-Feb-2023

    Evidence

  27. 28-Nov-2022

    Evidence

  28. 14-Sep-2022

    Evidence

  29. 27-Jul-2022

    Evidence

  30. 18-May-2022

    Evidence

  31. 23-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  32. 01-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  33. 04-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  34. 25-Aug-2021

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate No II, Usilampatti.

  35. 28-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 28-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 64/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: CC 64/2021, Judicial Magistrate Court II, Usilampatti Outcome: A petition filed by the accused (who was absent) was allowed by the court. The witness (PW1) provided deposition on 24.03.2026, testifying that the accused assaulted the witness, his wife, and daughter with a stick six years prior, causing injuries. The cross-examination of the accused was noted as "nil." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case