Sivakumar vs Checkanurani Police Station. — 100/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 07th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD180003842026
Filing Number
384/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
100/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Usilampatti
Judge
2-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, USILAMPATTI.
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
81
Police Station
CHECKANURANI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivakumar
Respondent(s)
Checkanurani Police Station.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, USILAMPATTI.
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 01-04-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 30-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 27-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court partially allowed Sivakumar's petition for interim custody of a seized lorry (TN 48 R 1224), finding he established prima facie ownership rights. The court granted custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 7 lakh bond, two sureties, non-alienation without court permission, and production of the vehicle when required for inquiry or trial, applying Supreme Court principles that seized property should not be retained longer than necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court partially allowed Sivakumar's petition for interim custody of a seized lorry (TN 48 R 1224), finding he established prima facie ownership rights. The court granted custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 7 lakh bond, two sureties, non-alienation without court permission, and production of the vehicle when required for inquiry or trial, applying Supreme Court principles that seized property should not be retained longer than necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts