Sivakumar vs Checkanurani Police Station. — 100/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 07th April 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNMD180003842026

Case disposed

Filing Number

384/2026

Filing Date

13-03-2026

Registration No

100/2026

Registration Date

13-03-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Usilampatti

Judge

2-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, USILAMPATTI.

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

CHECKANURANI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

Sivakumar

Respondent(s)

Checkanurani Police Station.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, USILAMPATTI.

07-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Issue of Service

01-04-2026

Issue of Service

30-03-2026

Issue of Service

27-03-2026

Issue of Service

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court partially allowed Sivakumar's petition for interim custody of a seized lorry (TN 48 R 1224), finding he established prima facie ownership rights. The court granted custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 7 lakh bond, two sureties, non-alienation without court permission, and production of the vehicle when required for inquiry or trial, applying Supreme Court principles that seized property should not be retained longer than necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court partially allowed Sivakumar's petition for interim custody of a seized lorry (TN 48 R 1224), finding he established prima facie ownership rights. The court granted custody subject to conditions including a Rs. 7 lakh bond, two sureties, non-alienation without court permission, and production of the vehicle when required for inquiry or trial, applying Supreme Court principles that seized property should not be retained longer than necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Usilampatti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case