Karthick vs M. Kallupatti Police Station. — 98/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(a), 331(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNMD180003822026
Filing Number
382/2026
Filing Date
13-03-2026
Registration No
98/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Usilampatti
Judge
2-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, USILAMPATTI.
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
M.KALLUPATTI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Karthick
Respondent(s)
M. Kallupatti Police Station.
Gurusamy
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, USILAMPATTI.
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 16-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 13-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.98/2026 The court granted bail to accused Karthik and Gurusamy, who were charged under sections 305(a) and 331(3) BNS. The Judicial Magistrate found that custodial interrogation was no longer necessary after the accused had spent 12 days in judicial custody and accepted their submissions regarding willingness to comply with court conditions. The accused were released on bail of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of like amount, with conditions including daily appearance at the police station and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.98/2026 The court granted bail to accused Karthik and Gurusamy, who were charged under sections 305(a) and 331(3) BNS. The Judicial Magistrate found that custodial interrogation was no longer necessary after the accused had spent 12 days in judicial custody and accepted their submissions regarding willingness to comply with court conditions. The accused were released on bail of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of like amount, with conditions including daily appearance at the police station and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts