INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTHAPPANAYAKANUR PS vs Vanadevi — 103/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 01st April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD180002792026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

279/2026

Filing Date

12-02-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Usilampatti

Judge

2-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, USILAMPATTI.

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

124

Police Station

UTHAPANAICKANUR

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

INSPECTOR OF POLICE UTHAPPANAYAKANUR PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

Vanadevi

Malaisamy

Veeranathevan

Ponnusamy

Arivalagan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, USILAMPATTI.

01-04-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Orders

23-03-2026

Counter

18-03-2026

Counter

16-03-2026

Counter

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Usilampatti allowed the discharge petition filed by the accused, discharging all petitioners from charges under Section 379 IPC (theft). The court found no prima facie case for theft, ruling that the prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients: no sand was recovered, no value stated, the land belonged to the accused, and no dishonest intention was demonstrated. The two-month delay in recovering the vehicle further undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court II, Usilampatti allowed the discharge petition filed by the accused, discharging all petitioners from charges under Section 379 IPC (theft). The court found no prima facie case for theft, ruling that the prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients: no sand was recovered, no value stated, the land belonged to the accused, and no dishonest intention was demonstrated. The two-month delay in recovering the vehicle further undermined the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Usilampatti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case