V. Raman vs Dr. J. Samuvel Selvakumar — 122/2017
Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNMD170001892017
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
150/2017
Filing Date
06-04-2017
Registration No
122/2017
Registration Date
06-04-2017
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Usilampatti
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate I, Usilampatti
Petitioner(s)
V. Raman
Respondent(s)
Dr. J. Samuvel Selvakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate I, Usilampatti
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 10-02-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 08-01-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 05-12-2025 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Summary This document is a deposition of witness (PW-3) named Aban Khan recorded on 13.02.2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Usilampatti in S.T.C. Case No.122/17. The witness provided testimony in Tamil regarding a financial dispute involving loans, money transactions, and property documents. The deposition was solemnly affirmed under Act X of 1873 (Indian Evidence Act), read back to the witness in open court, and admitted as correct by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This document is a deposition of witness (PW-3) named Aban Khan recorded on 13.02.2019 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Usilampatti in S.T.C. Case No.122/17. The witness provided testimony in Tamil regarding a financial dispute involving loans, money transactions, and property documents. The deposition was solemnly affirmed under Act X of 1873 (Indian Evidence Act), read back to the witness in open court, and admitted as correct by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts