S I of Police Usilampatti Taluk P S vs Vandapuli — 23/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 355, 386, 506(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD170001192019

Evidence

Next Hearing

29th July 2026

Filing Number

93/2019

Filing Date

08-02-2019

Registration No

23/2019

Registration Date

08-02-2019

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Usilampatti

Judge

1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate I, Usilampatti

FIR Details

FIR Number

215

Police Station

USILAMPATTI TALUK

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 355, 386, 506(i)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

S I of Police Usilampatti Taluk P S

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vandapuli

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate I, Usilampatti

10-06-2026

Evidence

27-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

12-01-2026

Evidence

04-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

23-09-2024
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: CC 15/2021 - Usilampatti The accused Varadharaju was acquitted and discharged of all charges (IPC Sections 294(b), 324, 323, 506(ii) and Tamil Nadu Protection of Women from Harassment Act Section 4). The court found that charges of criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and using abusive language on August 11, 2020 were not proven beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution witnesses contradicted each other and the victim-informant failed to testify consistently about the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 15/2021 - Usilampatti The accused Varadharaju was acquitted and discharged of all charges (IPC Sections 294(b), 324, 323, 506(ii) and Tamil Nadu Protection of Women from Harassment Act Section 4). The court found that charges of criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and using abusive language on August 11, 2020 were not proven beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution witnesses contradicted each other and the victim-informant failed to testify consistently about the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Usilampatti All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case