Inspector of Police, AWPS UPT vs Manikandan and 3 others — 4/2023
Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 24th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMD170000402023
Filing Number
38/2023
Filing Date
12-01-2023
Registration No
4/2023
Registration Date
24-01-2023
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Usilampatti
Judge
1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate I, Usilampatti
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
AWPS - Usilampatti
Year
2022
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, AWPS UPT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Manikandan and 3 others
Najil Murugesan
Vijayalakshmi
Keerthigadevi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate I, Usilampatti
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 10-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 4/2023 The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate in Usilampatti recorded the testimony of PW8 (Kannathal), a police officer, regarding a criminal case filed under IPC sections 498(A), 406, 294(b), and 506(i). The witness testified about an FIR filed on 23.06.2022 based on a complaint received on 15.06.2022, detailing allegations of cruelty, criminal breach of trust, and criminal intimidation against the accused. During cross-examination, procedural irregularities were highlighted, including delays in filing the FIR and lack of documentary evidence such as photographs or receipts for alleged payments to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 4/2023 The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate in Usilampatti recorded the testimony of PW8 (Kannathal), a police officer, regarding a criminal case filed under IPC sections 498(A), 406, 294(b), and 506(i). The witness testified about an FIR filed on 23.06.2022 based on a complaint received on 15.06.2022, detailing allegations of cruelty, criminal breach of trust, and criminal intimidation against the accused. During cross-examination, procedural irregularities were highlighted, including delays in filing the FIR and lack of documentary evidence such as photographs or receipts for alleged payments to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts