THE SI OF POLICE AWPS MELUR vs SARAVANAN — 580/2021
Case under Prohibition of Child Marriage Act 2006 Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNMD160008392021
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
838/2021
Filing Date
25-08-2021
Registration No
580/2021
Registration Date
25-08-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Melur
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Melur
FIR Details
FIR Number
9
Police Station
AWPS-MELUR
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE SI OF POLICE AWPS MELUR
Adv. THE APP GR II.,
Respondent(s)
SARAVANAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Melur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition (PW-3) in ST.C.No. 580/2021 before the Judicial Magistrate, Melur, recorded on 09.03.2026 in a child marriage case. The witness, a former social welfare officer, testified about reporting an alleged child marriage involving a 17-year-old girl named Divya to Saravan on 28.01.2018 after receiving information through a phone call. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's investigation procedure, noting that no direct complaint was filed by the victim, no supporting documents were attached, and the victim was never formally interviewed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition (PW-3) in ST.C.No. 580/2021 before the Judicial Magistrate, Melur, recorded on 09.03.2026 in a child marriage case. The witness, a former social welfare officer, testified about reporting an alleged child marriage involving a 17-year-old girl named Divya to Saravan on 28.01.2018 after receiving information through a phone call. During cross-examination, the defense challenged the witness's investigation procedure, noting that no direct complaint was filed by the victim, no supporting documents were attached, and the victim was never formally interviewed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts