Malliga vs Palaniappan and One another Advocate - V.R.Subbiah — 100111/2012
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U/oVIIRule1ofcpc. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 26th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNMD150002772012
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100111/2012
Filing Date
07-03-2012
Registration No
100111/2012
Registration Date
09-04-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Melur
Judge
1-District Munsif, Melur.
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malliga
Adv. V.P. Kannan
Respondent(s)
Palaniappan and One another Advocate - V.R.Subbiah
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Melur.
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The District Court of Madurai ruled that the plaintiff (Mrs. Mallika) is not entitled to partition of ancestral property valued at 1/3 share as claimed. The court found that the property was distributed through a valid will dated 12.01.1981 written by the deceased Subbaiah Chettiar and his first wife Muthukaruppai, which specifically bequeathed separate portions to the two defendants (Anjaneyappan and Markanddan) as heirs, leaving no share for the plaintiff. The court accordingly dismissed the plaintiff's claim while granting partition rights to the defendants in accordance with the will's provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Decision The District Court of Madurai ruled that the plaintiff (Mrs. Mallika) is not entitled to partition of ancestral property valued at 1/3 share as claimed. The court found that the property was distributed through a valid will dated 12.01.1981 written by the deceased Subbaiah Chettiar and his first wife Muthukaruppai, which specifically bequeathed separate portions to the two defendants (Anjaneyappan and Markanddan) as heirs, leaving no share for the plaintiff. The court accordingly dismissed the plaintiff's claim while granting partition rights to the defendants in accordance with the will's provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts