S.P.Udayappan vs C.Jambuingam — 100271/2016

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNMD150002722016

Evidence

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

100271/2016

Filing Date

04-11-2016

Registration No

100271/2016

Registration Date

04-11-2016

Court

District Munsif Court, Melur

Judge

1-District Munsif, Melur.

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 7
IA/5/2026 Classification : Petition to Accept Power of Attorney Section C.JambuingamS.P.Udayappan

Petitioner(s)

S.P.Udayappan

Adv. A.P.Athithan

SP.R.Valliammai

Adv. Athithan

RM.Subramanian

Respondent(s)

C.Jambuingam

C.Rajasekaran

Arun

M. Amutha

C.Ilango

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif, Melur.

17-04-2026

Evidence

10-04-2026

Evidence

08-04-2026

Evidence

06-04-2026

Evidence

30-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

09-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 271/2016 | District Munsif Court, Melur Matter: Deposition of Witness PW2 (Thiru Ramasamy) Date: 9th March 2026 The witness was examined and cross-examined on the deposition recorded. The court heard detailed arguments regarding the survey report, photographs (64 images marked as Ex. C3), and boundary demarcation issues. The witness's testimony regarding property boundaries, survey methodology, and discrepancies in plot identification was scrutinized through cross-examination covering ten key points regarding survey accuracy and completeness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 271/2016 | District Munsif Court, Melur Matter: Deposition of Witness PW2 (Thiru Ramasamy) Date: 9th March 2026 The witness was examined and cross-examined on the deposition recorded. The court heard detailed arguments regarding the survey report, photographs (64 images marked as Ex. C3), and boundary demarcation issues. The witness's testimony regarding property boundaries, survey methodology, and discrepancies in plot identification was scrutinized through cross-examination covering ten key points regarding survey accuracy and completeness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Melur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case