T. Deivanathan and one other vs T.S. Anandan and one other Array[3]- K.V.S.C.Sudarsan Babu — 100303/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7Rule14AofCPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNMD150001942014
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
100303/2014
Filing Date
17-09-2014
Registration No
100303/2014
Registration Date
17-09-2014
Court
District Munsif Court, Melur
Judge
1-District Munsif, Melur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T. Deivanathan and one other
Adv. C. Ramani Durai
Respondent(s)
T.S. Anandan and one other Array[3]- K.V.S.C.Sudarsan Babu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Melur.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 303/2014 Outcome: The court recorded the cross-examination of defendants 1 and 2 on 26.03.2026. The case involves a property dispute concerning land dimensions and ownership rights. The petitioner (T. Deivanathan) disputes the exact measurements of a property purchased, with conflicting dimensions mentioned in various sale deeds (22x44 feet vs. 24x44 feet). The court proceeded with witness examination and cross-examination of the defendants. The cross-examination of defendants 3, 4, and 8 was deferred to a later date, and the case continues with further proceedings pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 303/2014 Outcome: The court recorded the cross-examination of defendants 1 and 2 on 26.03.2026. The case involves a property dispute concerning land dimensions and ownership rights. The petitioner (T. Deivanathan) disputes the exact measurements of a property purchased, with conflicting dimensions mentioned in various sale deeds (22x44 feet vs. 24x44 feet). The court proceeded with witness examination and cross-examination of the defendants. The cross-examination of defendants 3, 4, and 8 was deferred to a later date, and the case continues with further proceedings pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts