P.Karunanidhi and four others vs E.M.G.S. Indhirani Advocate - S.Ramesh and Janaki Ramulu and K.M. Thiruppathi — 100254/2009
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/oVIIRule1ofcpc. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD150001192009
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Date
18-09-2009
Registration No
100254/2009
Registration Date
19-10-2009
Court
District Munsif Court, Melur
Judge
1-District Munsif, Melur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Karunanidhi and four others
Adv. T.K.Gopalan
Respondent(s)
E.M.G.S. Indhirani Advocate - S.Ramesh and Janaki Ramulu and K.M. Thiruppathi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Melur.
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary Case: O.S. No. 254/2009, District Munsif Court, Melur Outcome: The court examined witness CW1 (Court Commissioner Tirupathi) on 09.04.2026 regarding property identification and survey number mapping in the original suit. The witness was cross-examined by the 13th defendant's counsel on discrepancies between old and new survey numbers and the accuracy of property descriptions in the commissioner's report. The deposition proceeded with the witness responding to multiple questions about property verification, survey documents, and the methodology used in preparing the official report. The case record reflects the testimony was recorded and certified by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case: O.S. No. 254/2009, District Munsif Court, Melur Outcome: The court examined witness CW1 (Court Commissioner Tirupathi) on 09.04.2026 regarding property identification and survey number mapping in the original suit. The witness was cross-examined by the 13th defendant's counsel on discrepancies between old and new survey numbers and the accuracy of property descriptions in the commissioner's report. The deposition proceeded with the witness responding to multiple questions about property verification, survey documents, and the methodology used in preparing the official report. The case record reflects the testimony was recorded and certified by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts