pitchaiammal and one other vs Vellaiammal and five others Advocate - K.R.Sudarshanaprabhu — 100237/2011
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U/oVIIRule1ofcpc. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD150000892011
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
12-09-2011
Registration No
100237/2011
Registration Date
12-10-2011
Court
District Munsif Court, Melur
Judge
1-District Munsif, Melur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
pitchaiammal and one other
Adv. K.Ramaiah
Respondent(s)
Vellaiammal and five others Advocate - K.R.Sudarshanaprabhu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Melur.
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 16-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 09-03-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 06-02-2026 | IA Pending | |
| 03-02-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this O.S. No. 237/2011 property dispute case dated 01.12.2025, the court examined witness testimony and evidence regarding a property transaction. The court found significant credibility issues with the plaintiff's case, including deceased defendants, lack of documentary proof of marriage, missing evidence regarding property details, and contradictions in the plaintiff's affidavit regarding the agreement date and transaction particulars. The case proceeded with cross-examination, and the judgment dismissed the petition, finding insufficient evidence to establish the plaintiff's claims regarding the alleged property transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this O.S. No. 237/2011 property dispute case dated 01.12.2025, the court examined witness testimony and evidence regarding a property transaction. The court found significant credibility issues with the plaintiff's case, including deceased defendants, lack of documentary proof of marriage, missing evidence regarding property details, and contradictions in the plaintiff's affidavit regarding the agreement date and transaction particulars. The case proceeded with cross-examination, and the judgment dismissed the petition, finding insufficient evidence to establish the plaintiff's claims regarding the alleged property transaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts