R.R. Ramdoss and 4 others vs R.R. Ragavendran and 5 others Advocate - Rajasekaran for D1 and T.k. Gopalan for D2,3,6 S.Ramasamy for D2 — 100191/2009
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section U/o.VIIRule1ofCPC. Disposed: Contested--Decreed without cost on 07th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNMD150000362009
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
17-07-2009
Registration No
100191/2009
Registration Date
18-08-2009
Court
District Munsif Court, Melur
Judge
1-District Munsif, Melur.
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed without cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R.R. Ramdoss and 4 others
Adv. M.N. Sankaran
Respondent(s)
R.R. Ragavendran and 5 others Advocate - Rajasekaran for D1 and T.k. Gopalan for D2,3,6 S.Ramasamy for D2
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Melur.
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision Case: A.O. Case No. 191/2009 from the District Munsiff Court, Madurai Court's Decision: The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' suit regarding two agricultural properties in dispute. The court held that: 1. Property 1 (6 hectares 76 acres) registered under survey nos. 95/1, 105/17, 107/3, 127/8, 127/12, 132/2, and 212/16 is declared as belonging to the plaintiff's family (specifically to Muniswami Ayyar's lineage as per the 31.10.1928 property partition deed) 2. Property 2 (3 hectares 20.5 acres, survey no. 107/2) is declared as jointly owned by both the plaintiffs and defendants The court rejected the defendants' claims that they had valid rights over these properties and found that the defendants were attempting to illegally alter revenue records and modify property ownership documents. The court also declined to recognize usufruct (cultivation) rights claimed by the plaintiffs for Property 2, finding insufficient evidence to support such claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Decision Case: A.O. Case No. 191/2009 from the District Munsiff Court, Madurai Court's Decision: The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' suit regarding two agricultural properties in dispute. The court held that: 1. Property 1 (6 hectares 76 acres) registered under survey nos. 95/1, 105/17, 107/3, 127/8, 127/12, 132/2, and 212/16 is declared as belonging to the plaintiff's family (specifically to Muniswami Ayyar's lineage as per the 31.10.1928 property partition deed) 2. Property 2 (3 hectares 20.5 acres, survey no. 107/2) is declared as jointly owned by both the plaintiffs and defendants The court rejected the defendants' claims that they had valid rights over these properties and found that the defendants were attempting to illegally alter revenue records and modify property ownership documents. The court also declined to recognize usufruct (cultivation) rights claimed by the plaintiffs for Property 2, finding insufficient evidence to support such claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts