SI of police Perungudi ps vs Ramkonar — 949/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,342,506(ii),109. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD140020502022

Filing Number

2050/2022

Filing Date

01-Aug-2022

Registration No

949/2022

Registration Date

16-Sep-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

602

Police Station

PERUNGUDI

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,342,506(ii),109

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of police Perungudi ps (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramkonar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate court in Thirumankalm acquitted three accused persons (Ramugonaar, Balpandi, and Cellpandi) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 342, and 506(2), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that while the government presented witnesses to an alleged July 1, 2020 incident involving abusive language, physical assault, and threats, the direct victim witnesses did not support the prosecution case, and no direct documentary evidence conclusively linked the accused to the alleged offenses. Applying the principle that doubt benefits the accused, the court discharged them under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  10. 20-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  11. 05-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  12. 17-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  13. 02-Dec-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  14. 19-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  15. 30-Apr-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  16. 24-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  17. 19-Dec-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  18. 12-Sep-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  19. 09-Jun-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  20. 10-May-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  21. 06-Feb-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  22. 29-Dec-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  23. 09-Dec-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  24. 16-Nov-2022

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  25. 04-Nov-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  26. 16-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 01-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 949/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate court in Thirumankalm acquitted three accused persons (Ramugonaar, Balpandi, and Cellpandi) of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, 342, and 506(2), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. The court determined that while the government presented witnesses to an alleged July 1, 2020 incident involving abusive language, physical assault, and threats, the direct victim witnesses did not support the prosecution case, and no direct documentary evidence conclusively linked the accused to the alleged offenses. Applying the principle that doubt benefits the accused, the court discharged them under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case