The Inspector of Police, TMM taluk P.S., vs Illamaran and 1 other — 414/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD140016792022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1679/2022

Filing Date

15-07-2022

Registration No

414/2022

Registration Date

01-08-2022

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

378

Police Station

THIRUMANGALAM TALUK

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 294(b),323,324,506(ii)

Petitioner(s)

The Inspector of Police, TMM taluk P.S.,

Adv. The APP

Respondent(s)

Illamaran and 1 other

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

09-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

Judgement

04-03-2026

Questioning

03-03-2026

Evidence

25-11-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thirumanagalam acquitted the 25-year-old accused of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. Although the accused was charged with abusing, assaulting, and threatening the complainant with a knife on November 13, 2017, the court determined that key witnesses—including the victim and eyewitnesses—failed to support the government's case during trial, creating sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thirumanagalam acquitted the 25-year-old accused of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. Although the accused was charged with abusing, assaulting, and threatening the complainant with a knife on November 13, 2017, the court determined that key witnesses—including the victim and eyewitnesses—failed to support the government's case during trial, creating sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case