The Inspector of Police, TMM taluk P.S., vs Illamaran and 1 other — 414/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,506(ii). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMD140016792022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1679/2022
Filing Date
15-07-2022
Registration No
414/2022
Registration Date
01-08-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
378
Police Station
THIRUMANGALAM TALUK
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Inspector of Police, TMM taluk P.S.,
Adv. The APP
Respondent(s)
Illamaran and 1 other
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 04-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thirumanagalam acquitted the 25-year-old accused of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. Although the accused was charged with abusing, assaulting, and threatening the complainant with a knife on November 13, 2017, the court determined that key witnesses—including the victim and eyewitnesses—failed to support the government's case during trial, creating sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thirumanagalam acquitted the 25-year-old accused of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 324, and 506(2), finding reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case. Although the accused was charged with abusing, assaulting, and threatening the complainant with a knife on November 13, 2017, the court determined that key witnesses—including the victim and eyewitnesses—failed to support the government's case during trial, creating sufficient doubt to warrant acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts