S.I. of police, TMM.Taluk p.s., vs Ramesh — 233/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD140012452021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1245/2021

Filing Date

26-11-2021

Registration No

233/2021

Registration Date

26-11-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

156

Police Station

THIRUMANGALAM TALUK

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 279, 304(A)

Petitioner(s)

S.I. of police, TMM.Taluk p.s.,

Adv. The APP

Respondent(s)

Ramesh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Judgement

09-03-2026

Questioning

23-02-2026

Evidence

17-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The Judicial Magistrate court in Thirumanagalam acquitted Ramesh of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence) in a fatal road accident case from July 2019. The court found that while the prosecution established that a government bus collided with a two-wheeler causing death, no eyewitness testimony directly proved the bus driver's rash or negligent driving, and the witnesses only heard about the accident rather than observing it, thus creating reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate court in Thirumanagalam acquitted Ramesh of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence) in a fatal road accident case from July 2019. The court found that while the prosecution established that a government bus collided with a two-wheeler causing death, no eyewitness testimony directly proved the bus driver's rash or negligent driving, and the witnesses only heard about the accident rather than observing it, thus creating reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case