S.I. of police, TMM.Taluk p.s., vs Ramesh — 233/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD140012452021

Filing Number

1245/2021

Filing Date

26-Nov-2021

Registration No

233/2021

Registration Date

26-Nov-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

156

Police Station

THIRUMANGALAM TALUK

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.I. of police, TMM.Taluk p.s.,

    Adv. The APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate court in Thirumanagalam acquitted Ramesh of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence) in a fatal road accident case from July 2019. The court found that while the prosecution established that a government bus collided with a two-wheeler causing death, no eyewitness testimony directly proved the bus driver's rash or negligent driving, and the witnesses only heard about the accident rather than observing it, thus creating reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  8. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  10. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  12. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  13. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  14. 14-Mar-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  15. 26-Nov-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  16. 14-Aug-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  17. 06-May-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  18. 29-Jan-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  19. 16-Oct-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  20. 11-Jul-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  21. 11-Apr-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  22. 04-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  23. 28-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  24. 28-Jul-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  25. 21-Jun-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  26. 16-May-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  27. 30-Mar-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  28. 24-Jan-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  29. 14-Dec-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  30. 26-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 26-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 233/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate court in Thirumanagalam acquitted Ramesh of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving) and 304(A) (death by negligence) in a fatal road accident case from July 2019. The court found that while the prosecution established that a government bus collided with a two-wheeler causing death, no eyewitness testimony directly proved the bus driver's rash or negligent driving, and the witnesses only heard about the accident rather than observing it, thus creating reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case