S.I. of police, perungudi p.s., vs Prasanna, Naga sivarajan, senthil kumar — 164/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 323, 506(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 01-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD140010832021

Filing Number

1083/2021

Filing Date

21-Sep-2021

Registration No

164/2021

Registration Date

21-Sep-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1421

Police Station

PERUNGUDI

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 323, 506(i)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.I. of police, perungudi p.s.,

    Adv. The APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prasanna, Naga sivarajan, senthil kumar

Case History

  1. 01-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Summary This document contains witness depositions (in Tamil) from Case No. CC. 164/2021 before the Judicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam. Three prosecution witnesses testified on 12.03.2026 regarding an incident from November 2020 involving alleged criminal intimidation, abusive language, and physical assault by three accused persons against lawyer Rabi. The witnesses (Rabi, Senthilkumar, and Muthumani) provided statements describing the confrontation and subsequent police complaint, with cross-examination noted as absent from the defense side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  7. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  8. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  9. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  10. 21-Jan-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  11. 12-Sep-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  12. 06-Jun-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  13. 02-Mar-2024

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  14. 21-Nov-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  15. 10-Aug-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  16. 10-May-2023

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  17. 03-Feb-2023

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  18. 31-Oct-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  19. 09-Sep-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  20. 08-Aug-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  21. 28-Jul-2022

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  22. 14-Jul-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  23. 17-Jun-2022

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  24. 26-Apr-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  25. 10-Mar-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  26. 15-Feb-2022

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  27. 16-Dec-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  28. 08-Nov-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  29. 05-Oct-2021

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

  30. 21-Sep-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 21-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 164/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This document contains witness depositions (in Tamil) from Case No. CC. 164/2021 before the Judicial Magistrate, Tirumangalam. Three prosecution witnesses testified on 12.03.2026 regarding an incident from November 2020 involving alleged criminal intimidation, abusive language, and physical assault by three accused persons against lawyer Rabi. The witnesses (Rabi, Senthilkumar, and Muthumani) provided statements describing the confrontation and subsequent police complaint, with cross-examination noted as absent from the defense side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case