Thirumangalam Town Police station vs Vigneshwaran — 253/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD140010082025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-04-2025

Filing Number

1008/2025

Filing Date

30-04-2025

Registration No

253/2025

Registration Date

30-04-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

THIRUMANGALAM TOWN

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(1),351(3)
TN PROHIBITION OF HARASSMENT OF WOMAN ACT, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

Thirumangalam Town Police station

Adv. Inspector of Police ThirumangalamTown PS

Respondent(s)

Vigneshwaran

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

17-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

Judgement

08-04-2026

Appearance

07-04-2026

Questioning

01-04-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

The Thirumangalam Town Police Station filed FIR No. 86/2025 against Vigneshwaran, accusing him of assaulting the complainant Mariyammaal on 15.03.2025 at 8:00 PM, causing injury with a knife to her elbow and making death threats against her and her husband, under IPC Sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPHW Act Section 4. The court found that while the complainant (PW1) testified she fell during a scuffle, eyewitnesses (PW2 and PW3) had no direct knowledge of the incident. The court noted the absence of direct testimony connecting the accused to the alleged crimes and found reasonable doubts in the prosecution's case. Despite documentary evidence presented through the police officer (PW4), the lack of credible eyewitness testimony supporting the assault allegations created insufficient grounds for conviction. The court acquitted Vigneshwaran under Section 271(1) BNSS, holding that the benefit of doubt must be given to the accused where evidence fails to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The Thirumangalam Town Police Station filed FIR No. 86/2025 against Vigneshwaran, accusing him of assaulting the complainant Mariyammaal on 15.03.2025 at 8:00 PM, causing injury with a knife to her elbow and making death threats against her and her husband, under IPC Sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPHW Act Section 4. The court found that while the complainant (PW1) testified she fell during a scuffle, eyewitnesses (PW2 and PW3) had no direct knowledge of the incident. The court noted the absence of direct testimony connecting the accused to the alleged crimes and found reasonable doubts in the prosecution's case. Despite documentary evidence presented through the police officer (PW4), the lack of credible eyewitness testimony supporting the assault allegations created insufficient grounds for conviction. The court acquitted Vigneshwaran under Section 271(1) BNSS, holding that the benefit of doubt must be given to the accused where evidence fails to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case