Thirumangalam Town Police station vs Vigneshwaran — 253/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),118(1),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMD140010082025
e-Filing Number
02-04-2025
Filing Number
1008/2025
Filing Date
30-04-2025
Registration No
253/2025
Registration Date
30-04-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
THIRUMANGALAM TOWN
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thirumangalam Town Police station
Adv. Inspector of Police ThirumangalamTown PS
Respondent(s)
Vigneshwaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Disposed
Judgement
Appearance
Questioning
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 08-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 07-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Thirumangalam Town Police Station filed FIR No. 86/2025 against Vigneshwaran, accusing him of assaulting the complainant Mariyammaal on 15.03.2025 at 8:00 PM, causing injury with a knife to her elbow and making death threats against her and her husband, under IPC Sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPHW Act Section 4. The court found that while the complainant (PW1) testified she fell during a scuffle, eyewitnesses (PW2 and PW3) had no direct knowledge of the incident. The court noted the absence of direct testimony connecting the accused to the alleged crimes and found reasonable doubts in the prosecution's case. Despite documentary evidence presented through the police officer (PW4), the lack of credible eyewitness testimony supporting the assault allegations created insufficient grounds for conviction. The court acquitted Vigneshwaran under Section 271(1) BNSS, holding that the benefit of doubt must be given to the accused where evidence fails to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Thirumangalam Town Police Station filed FIR No. 86/2025 against Vigneshwaran, accusing him of assaulting the complainant Mariyammaal on 15.03.2025 at 8:00 PM, causing injury with a knife to her elbow and making death threats against her and her husband, under IPC Sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) and TNPHW Act Section 4. The court found that while the complainant (PW1) testified she fell during a scuffle, eyewitnesses (PW2 and PW3) had no direct knowledge of the incident. The court noted the absence of direct testimony connecting the accused to the alleged crimes and found reasonable doubts in the prosecution's case. Despite documentary evidence presented through the police officer (PW4), the lack of credible eyewitness testimony supporting the assault allegations created insufficient grounds for conviction. The court acquitted Vigneshwaran under Section 271(1) BNSS, holding that the benefit of doubt must be given to the accused where evidence fails to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts