S.I. of police, TMM.Town p.s., vs Jeya prakash — 213/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279, 304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMD140008772022
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
877/2022
Filing Date
04-07-2022
Registration No
213/2022
Registration Date
04-07-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
FIR Details
FIR Number
84
Police Station
THIRUMANGALAM TOWN
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.I. of police, TMM.Town p.s.,
Adv. The APP
Respondent(s)
Jeya prakash
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 18-08-2025 | Evidence | |
| 21-06-2025 | Evidence | |
| 22-03-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a deposition of witnesses (dated 09.03.2026) in Case No. CC.213/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirumangalam, involving an auto-rickshaw accident from 31.01.2017. Two prosecution witnesses testified: the son of the deceased (Sathiskumar) and the wife of the deceased (Santi), both stating that the accused (Jayaprakash) recklessly drove the auto at high speed, causing it to overturn and fatally injuring Ravishandiram. The court noted the witnesses admitted limited direct knowledge of accident details but testified based on police investigation findings, with no cross-examination by the defense recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a deposition of witnesses (dated 09.03.2026) in Case No. CC.213/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirumangalam, involving an auto-rickshaw accident from 31.01.2017. Two prosecution witnesses testified: the son of the deceased (Sathiskumar) and the wife of the deceased (Santi), both stating that the accused (Jayaprakash) recklessly drove the auto at high speed, causing it to overturn and fatally injuring Ravishandiram. The court noted the witnesses admitted limited direct knowledge of accident details but testified based on police investigation findings, with no cross-examination by the defense recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts