S.I. of police, Sindhupatti p.s., vs Rajmohan — 102/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457, 394. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNMD140004052021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
405/2021
Filing Date
30-07-2021
Registration No
102/2021
Registration Date
30-07-2021
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
968
Police Station
SINDUPATTI
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.I. of police, Sindhupatti p.s.,
Adv. The APP
Respondent(s)
Rajmohan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 12-03-2026 | Questioning | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirumangalam acquitted the accused, Rajmohan, of charges under IPC sections 457 (criminal intimidation) and 394 (dacoity) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the complainant alleged the accused broke into his home at night and stole a gold chain, the key witnesses—including the victim and eyewitnesses—failed to provide credible testimony supporting the prosecution's case. The court applied the principle of "benefit of doubt" and released the accused under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirumangalam acquitted the accused, Rajmohan, of charges under IPC sections 457 (criminal intimidation) and 394 (dacoity) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the complainant alleged the accused broke into his home at night and stole a gold chain, the key witnesses—including the victim and eyewitnesses—failed to provide credible testimony supporting the prosecution's case. The court applied the principle of "benefit of doubt" and released the accused under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts