S.I. of police, Sindhupatti p.s., vs Rajmohan — 102/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457, 394. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 16th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNMD140004052021

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

405/2021

Filing Date

30-07-2021

Registration No

102/2021

Registration Date

30-07-2021

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

968

Police Station

SINDUPATTI

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 457, 394

Petitioner(s)

S.I. of police, Sindhupatti p.s.,

Adv. The APP

Respondent(s)

Rajmohan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Judgement

12-03-2026

Questioning

09-03-2026

Evidence

03-03-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirumangalam acquitted the accused, Rajmohan, of charges under IPC sections 457 (criminal intimidation) and 394 (dacoity) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the complainant alleged the accused broke into his home at night and stole a gold chain, the key witnesses—including the victim and eyewitnesses—failed to provide credible testimony supporting the prosecution's case. The court applied the principle of "benefit of doubt" and released the accused under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court in Tirumangalam acquitted the accused, Rajmohan, of charges under IPC sections 457 (criminal intimidation) and 394 (dacoity) due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the complainant alleged the accused broke into his home at night and stole a gold chain, the key witnesses—including the victim and eyewitnesses—failed to provide credible testimony supporting the prosecution's case. The court applied the principle of "benefit of doubt" and released the accused under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thirumangalam All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case